Orgo MCP Server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: it specifies the Desktop location, syncing behavior across project computers, and a 10MB file size limit. While annotations cover basic safety (destructiveHint: false), the description provides practical constraints that help the agent understand operational boundaries.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is perfectly structured: purpose statement first, followed by key behavioral constraints, then parameter details, and finally return value. Every sentence earns its place with zero wasted words, making it easy for an agent to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given this is a mutation tool with annotations, the description provides excellent completeness: clear purpose, behavioral constraints, parameter explanations, and output information. With an output schema present, the description appropriately focuses on operational context rather than return value details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by providing a clear parameter breakdown with meaningful explanations for each field. It explains what computer_id, filename, content_base64, and content_type represent, adding substantial value beyond the bare schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Upload a file') and target resource ('to the computer's Desktop'), distinguishing it from siblings like orgo_download_file (download) and orgo_delete_file (delete). It provides additional context about syncing behavior that further clarifies its purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context about when to use this tool (uploading files to Desktop with syncing across project computers) and includes a maximum file size constraint. However, it doesn't explicitly state when NOT to use it or name specific alternatives like orgo_export_file for different file operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.