import { PromptDefinition } from './types.js';
/**
* Prompt to hunt for missing considerations, gaps, and overlooked risks.
*/
export const blindspotsPrompt: PromptDefinition = {
name: 'blindspots',
description:
'Hunt for missing considerations, overlooked risks, and gaps in a proposal. Acts as a panel of critical reviewers looking for what might be underweighted.',
arguments: [
{
name: 'proposal',
description: 'The plan, code, design, or proposal to review for blindspots',
required: true,
},
{
name: 'covered',
description: 'What you think you have already addressed or considered',
required: false,
},
{
name: 'risk_tolerance',
description: 'Your risk tolerance level: low, medium, or high',
required: false,
},
],
buildMessages: (args: Record<string, string>) => {
const { proposal, covered, risk_tolerance } = args;
if (!proposal) {
throw new Error('proposal argument is required');
}
let messageText = `Act as a panel of critical reviewers looking for blindspots.
**PROPOSAL TO REVIEW:**
${proposal}
`;
if (covered) {
messageText += `
**ALREADY CONSIDERED:**
${covered}
`;
}
if (risk_tolerance) {
messageText += `
**RISK TOLERANCE:** ${risk_tolerance}
`;
}
messageText += `
**YOUR TASK:**
Each reviewer should identify 2-3 potential blindspots:
1. **Failure modes** - Ways this could fail that aren't being considered
2. **Missing considerations** - Important factors that are overlooked
3. **Edge cases** - Scenarios that might break assumptions
4. **Dependencies** - External factors that could cause problems
For each blindspot:
- Be specific about WHAT the concern is
- Explain WHY it's concerning (impact if it happens)
- Suggest potential mitigations
Look for things that are easy to miss because they seem "obvious" or fall outside the immediate scope. Different reviewers should explore different angles.`;
return [
{
role: 'user',
content: {
type: 'text',
text: messageText,
},
},
];
},
};
