Skip to main content
Glama
mobile-next

Mobile Next MCP Server

Official
by mobile-next

Save Screenshot

mobile_save_screenshot
Destructive

Capture and save mobile device screenshots to specified file paths for automation testing and debugging purposes.

Instructions

Save a screenshot of the mobile device to a file

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
deviceYesThe device identifier to use. Use mobile_list_available_devices to find which devices are available to you.
saveToYesThe path to save the screenshot to

Implementation Reference

  • The main handler function for the 'mobile_save_screenshot' tool. It retrieves the appropriate Robot instance for the given device, captures a screenshot using robot.getScreenshot(), and saves it to the specified file path using fs.writeFileSync.
    async ({ device, saveTo }) => {
    	const robot = getRobotFromDevice(device);
    
    	const screenshot = await robot.getScreenshot();
    	fs.writeFileSync(saveTo, screenshot);
    	return `Screenshot saved to: ${saveTo}`;
  • Input schema definition using Zod for the tool parameters: device ID and save path.
    {
    	device: z.string().describe("The device identifier to use. Use mobile_list_available_devices to find which devices are available to you."),
    	saveTo: z.string().describe("The path to save the screenshot to"),
  • src/server.ts:504-519 (registration)
    Tool registration call using the 'tool' helper function, which internally calls server.registerTool with title, description, inputSchema, and the handler.
    tool(
    	"mobile_save_screenshot",
    	"Save Screenshot",
    	"Save a screenshot of the mobile device to a file",
    	{
    		device: z.string().describe("The device identifier to use. Use mobile_list_available_devices to find which devices are available to you."),
    		saveTo: z.string().describe("The path to save the screenshot to"),
    	},
    	async ({ device, saveTo }) => {
    		const robot = getRobotFromDevice(device);
    
    		const screenshot = await robot.getScreenshot();
    		fs.writeFileSync(saveTo, screenshot);
    		return `Screenshot saved to: ${saveTo}`;
    	}
    );
  • Helper function to get the appropriate Robot implementation (AndroidRobot, IosRobot, or MobileDevice) based on the device ID, used in the handler.
    const getRobotFromDevice = (deviceId: string): Robot => {
    
    	// from now on, we must have mobilecli working
    	ensureMobilecliAvailable();
    
    	// Check if it's an iOS device
    	const iosManager = new IosManager();
    	const iosDevices = iosManager.listDevices();
    	const iosDevice = iosDevices.find(d => d.deviceId === deviceId);
    	if (iosDevice) {
    		return new IosRobot(deviceId);
    	}
    
    	// Check if it's an Android device
    	const androidManager = new AndroidDeviceManager();
    	const androidDevices = androidManager.getConnectedDevices();
    	const androidDevice = androidDevices.find(d => d.deviceId === deviceId);
    	if (androidDevice) {
    		return new AndroidRobot(deviceId);
    	}
    
    	// Check if it's a simulator (will later replace all other device types as well)
    	const response = mobilecli.getDevices({
    		platform: "ios",
    		type: "simulator",
    		includeOffline: false,
    	});
    
    	if (response.status === "ok" && response.data && response.data.devices) {
    		for (const device of response.data.devices) {
    			if (device.id === deviceId) {
    				return new MobileDevice(deviceId);
    			}
    		}
    	}
    
    	throw new ActionableError(`Device "${deviceId}" not found. Use the mobile_list_available_devices tool to see available devices.`);
    };
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations include 'destructiveHint: true', indicating potential side effects like file system changes. The description adds value by specifying that it saves to a file, which clarifies the destructive nature. However, it lacks details on permissions, error handling, or rate limits, leaving behavioral gaps despite the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It's front-loaded with the core action and resource, making it easy to parse quickly. Every part of the sentence contributes directly to understanding the tool's function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive annotation and lack of output schema, the description adequately covers the basic action but misses details like return values or error conditions. It's sufficient for a simple tool but could benefit from more context about what happens after saving (e.g., success confirmation).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage, the input schema fully documents both parameters ('device' and 'saveTo'). The description adds no additional semantic context beyond what's in the schema, such as file format or device compatibility details, so it meets the baseline but doesn't enhance understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Save a screenshot') and resource ('of the mobile device to a file'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from the sibling tool 'mobile_take_screenshot', which likely serves a similar function, leaving some ambiguity about when to use one versus the other.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'mobile_take_screenshot'. It mentions the device parameter's dependency on 'mobile_list_available_devices', but this is part of the input schema, not explicit usage instructions. There's no mention of prerequisites, timing, or contextual factors.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mobile-next/mobile-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server