# π Pull Request
## π Description
Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context.
Fixes # (issue number)
## π§ Type of Change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] π Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] π New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] π₯ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
- [ ] π Documentation update
- [ ] π¨ Style update (formatting, renaming)
- [ ] β»οΈ Refactoring (no functional changes)
- [ ] β‘ Performance improvement
- [ ] π§ͺ Test update
- [ ] π§ Build/CI update
- [ ] Other (please describe):
## β
Checklist
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
## π§ͺ Testing
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce.
1. Test Configuration:
- OS: [e.g., Windows 10]
- Python Version: [e.g., 3.9]
- Outlook Version: [e.g., Outlook 365]
2. Test Commands:
```bash
# Add test commands here
pytest tests/ -v
```
3. Test Results:
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Some tests fail (please specify)
- [ ] Manual testing performed
## πΈ Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your changes.
## π Performance Impact
Describe the performance impact of your changes:
- Before: [e.g., 100 emails in 5 seconds]
- After: [e.g., 100 emails in 2 seconds]
- Improvement: [e.g., 60% faster]
## π Additional Context
Add any other context about the pull request here.
## π₯ Reviewers
Tag potential reviewers or people who should review this PR.
## π Notes
Any additional notes for the reviewers.