# Pull Request
## Description
<!-- Provide a clear and concise description of what this PR does -->
### Type of Change
<!-- Mark the relevant option with an [x] -->
- [ ] **Bug fix** (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
- [ ] **New feature** (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
- [ ] **Breaking change** (fix or feature that causes existing functionality to change)
- [ ] **Performance improvement** (improves performance without changing functionality)
- [ ] **Refactoring** (code changes that neither fix bugs nor add features)
- [ ] **Documentation** (updates to documentation only)
- [ ] **Algorithm enhancement** (improvements to evolutionary algorithms)
- [ ] **Deployment/Infrastructure** (changes to build, CI, deployment)
### Component Affected
<!-- Mark all relevant components -->
- [ ] **Evolutionary Engine** (`src/mcp_core.ts`)
- [ ] **MCP Protocol Implementation** (`src/index.ts`, `src/http_server.ts`)
- [ ] **Tool Definitions** (start_evolution, add_solution, score_solution, etc.)
- [ ] **Smithery Deployment** (`smithery.yaml`, `Dockerfile`)
- [ ] **Build System** (`package.json`, `tsconfig.json`)
- [ ] **Documentation** (README, CONTRIBUTING, etc.)
- [ ] **Testing** (test files, test configurations)
## Changes Made
<!-- Describe the specific changes made in this PR -->
### Evolutionary Algorithm Changes
<!-- If applicable, describe changes to genetic algorithms, selection, crossover, mutation, etc. -->
### MCP Protocol Changes
<!-- If applicable, describe changes to tool definitions, request handling, etc. -->
### API Changes
<!-- List any changes to public APIs, tool interfaces, or configuration options -->
### Performance Impact
<!-- Describe any performance implications, positive or negative -->
## Testing
### Test Coverage
<!-- Mark all testing that has been completed -->
- [ ] **Unit tests** added/updated for new functionality
- [ ] **Integration tests** verify end-to-end workflows
- [ ] **Performance tests** validate scalability improvements
- [ ] **Algorithm tests** verify evolutionary algorithm correctness
- [ ] **MCP protocol tests** ensure compliance with specification
- [ ] **Regression tests** confirm existing functionality still works
### Manual Testing
<!-- Describe manual testing performed -->
- [ ] **Local stdio server** tested with Claude Desktop
- [ ] **HTTP server** tested locally (port 8000)
- [ ] **Container build** successfully builds and runs
- [ ] **Smithery deployment** tested (if applicable)
- [ ] **Tool functionality** verified for all 5 evolutionary tools
- [ ] **Error handling** tested with invalid inputs
- [ ] **Performance testing** with large populations/generations
### Test Results
<!-- Provide details of test results -->
**Evolution Test Results:**
```
Population size tested: ___
Max generations tested: ___
Consistency checks tested: ___
Convergence achieved: Yes/No
Average runtime: ___ seconds
Memory usage: ___ MB
```
**MCP Protocol Test Results:**
```bash
# Example test commands and results
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/mcp \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"tools/list","id":1}'
# Result: (paste result here)
```
## Code Quality
### Code Review Checklist
<!-- Mark all items that have been verified -->
- [ ] **TypeScript compilation** succeeds without errors or warnings
- [ ] **ESLint/Prettier** rules followed (if configured)
- [ ] **Code documentation** added for new functions/classes
- [ ] **Error handling** implemented for all failure cases
- [ ] **Input validation** added for all user inputs
- [ ] **Type safety** maintained (no `any` types added)
- [ ] **Memory management** considered for long-running processes
- [ ] **Async/await** used consistently for asynchronous operations
### Backward Compatibility
- [ ] **No breaking changes** to existing APIs
- [ ] **Migration path** provided for breaking changes (if any)
- [ ] **Default values** maintained for existing configuration options
- [ ] **Existing tool behavior** preserved
## Deployment
### Build Verification
<!-- Mark completed build/deployment checks -->
- [ ] **`npm run build`** succeeds without errors
- [ ] **TypeScript compilation** produces valid JavaScript
- [ ] **Both servers** (stdio and HTTP) start successfully
- [ ] **Container build** works with Docker
- [ ] **Smithery compatibility** verified (if deployment-related)
### Deployment Testing
- [ ] **Local deployment** tested thoroughly
- [ ] **Container deployment** tested with Docker
- [ ] **Smithery deployment** verified (if applicable)
- [ ] **Environment variables** handled correctly
- [ ] **Configuration options** work as expected
## Documentation
### Documentation Updates
<!-- Mark all documentation that has been updated -->
- [ ] **README.md** updated for new features
- [ ] **CONTRIBUTING.md** updated if development process changed
- [ ] **Code comments** added for complex logic
- [ ] **Tool descriptions** updated in code and README
- [ ] **Configuration documentation** updated
- [ ] **API documentation** updated for new interfaces
- [ ] **Deployment guides** updated if needed
### Examples and Usage
- [ ] **Usage examples** provided for new features
- [ ] **Configuration examples** updated
- [ ] **Tutorial content** added/updated if appropriate
## Related Issues
<!-- Link related issues -->
Fixes #(issue_number)
Relates to #(issue_number)
Part of #(issue_number)
## Breaking Changes
<!-- If this PR introduces breaking changes, describe them in detail -->
**Breaking Changes:** (None / Describe changes)
**Migration Guide:**
<!-- If breaking changes exist, provide step-by-step migration instructions -->
## Algorithm Performance
<!-- For algorithm-related changes, provide performance analysis -->
### Benchmarks
<!-- Compare performance before and after changes -->
**Before:**
```
Metric 1: ___ (units)
Metric 2: ___ (units)
```
**After:**
```
Metric 1: ___ (units) - ___% improvement
Metric 2: ___ (units) - ___% improvement
```
### Scalability Impact
<!-- How do changes affect performance with different problem sizes? -->
## Security Considerations
### Security Review
<!-- Mark security-related checks -->
- [ ] **Input validation** prevents injection attacks
- [ ] **Resource limits** prevent DoS attacks
- [ ] **Error messages** don't leak sensitive information
- [ ] **Dependencies** don't introduce vulnerabilities
- [ ] **Container security** best practices followed (if applicable)
## Additional Context
### Research and References
<!-- Include links to papers, articles, or other implementations that influenced this work -->
### Future Work
<!-- Describe follow-up work that this PR enables -->
### Screenshots/Examples
<!-- Include screenshots, diagrams, or example outputs if relevant -->
## Reviewer Notes
### Areas of Focus
<!-- Guide reviewers to specific areas that need attention -->
- Pay special attention to: ___
- Known limitations: ___
- Areas that need expert review: ___
### Testing Assistance
<!-- What additional testing would be helpful? -->
---
## Checklist for Reviewers
### Code Review
- [ ] Code follows project conventions and style guidelines
- [ ] Logic is sound and algorithms are correctly implemented
- [ ] Error handling is comprehensive and appropriate
- [ ] Performance implications are acceptable
- [ ] Security considerations have been addressed
### Functional Review
- [ ] Feature works as described in the PR description
- [ ] All evolutionary algorithm tools function correctly
- [ ] MCP protocol compliance is maintained
- [ ] No regressions in existing functionality
### Documentation Review
- [ ] Documentation is clear and complete
- [ ] Code comments explain complex logic
- [ ] Public APIs are properly documented
- [ ] Examples are accurate and helpful
Thank you for contributing to Event Horizon! 🚀
