Tiger MCP

name: ✨ Feature Request description: Suggest a new feature or enhancement for the Tiger MCP System title: "[FEATURE] " labels: ["enhancement", "needs-triage"] assignees: [] body: - type: markdown attributes: value: | Thanks for taking the time to suggest a new feature! Please provide as much detail as possible to help us understand and evaluate your request. - type: checkboxes id: preflight attributes: label: Preflight Checklist description: Please confirm you have completed the following options: - label: I have searched existing issues to ensure this is not a duplicate required: true - label: I have reviewed the roadmap and planned features required: true - label: This feature aligns with the project's goals and scope required: true - type: dropdown id: component attributes: label: Component description: Which component would this feature primarily affect? options: - MCP Server - Dashboard API - Database - Shared Libraries - Docker/Infrastructure - CI/CD - Documentation - Tiger API Integration - User Interface - Other validations: required: true - type: dropdown id: type attributes: label: Feature Type description: What type of feature is this? options: - New Functionality - Enhancement to Existing Feature - Performance Improvement - Developer Experience - User Experience - Integration - Security Enhancement - Monitoring/Observability validations: required: true - type: textarea id: summary attributes: label: Feature Summary description: A brief, clear summary of the proposed feature placeholder: In one or two sentences, describe what you'd like to see added or improved validations: required: true - type: textarea id: problem attributes: label: Problem Statement description: What problem does this feature solve? What pain point does it address? placeholder: | Describe the current limitation, inefficiency, or missing functionality that this feature would address. Example: - Current workflow requires manual steps that could be automated - Users frequently request information that isn't easily accessible - Performance bottlenecks in specific scenarios validations: required: true - type: textarea id: solution attributes: label: Proposed Solution description: Describe your proposed solution in detail placeholder: | Provide a detailed description of how you envision this feature working. Consider: - User interface changes - API modifications - New workflows or processes - Integration points - Configuration options validations: required: true - type: textarea id: user_stories attributes: label: User Stories description: Provide user stories that illustrate how this feature would be used placeholder: | As a [type of user], I want [goal] so that [benefit]. Example: - As a trader, I want to see real-time portfolio performance metrics so that I can make informed decisions quickly - As a developer, I want automated error recovery so that I can focus on building features instead of manual interventions validations: required: true - type: textarea id: alternatives attributes: label: Alternative Solutions description: What alternatives have you considered? placeholder: | Describe any alternative approaches or workarounds you've considered: - Different implementation approaches - Existing tools or services that could be used - Manual processes currently being used - Why these alternatives are insufficient - type: dropdown id: priority attributes: label: Priority description: How important is this feature? options: - Critical (Blocking major use cases) - High (Significant improvement to user experience) - Medium (Nice to have, moderate impact) - Low (Minor convenience feature) validations: required: true - type: dropdown id: complexity attributes: label: Estimated Complexity description: How complex do you think this feature would be to implement? options: - Low (Small change, few components affected) - Medium (Moderate change, some design needed) - High (Significant change, multiple components) - Very High (Major feature, extensive design and development) validations: required: true - type: textarea id: acceptance_criteria attributes: label: Acceptance Criteria description: What would define this feature as "done"? placeholder: | List specific, measurable criteria that would indicate this feature is complete: - [ ] User can perform X action - [ ] System responds within Y seconds - [ ] Feature works on all supported platforms - [ ] Documentation is updated - [ ] Tests are implemented with >80% coverage validations: required: true - type: textarea id: technical_requirements attributes: label: Technical Requirements description: Any specific technical requirements or considerations? placeholder: | Consider: - Performance requirements (response times, throughput) - Security requirements - Compatibility requirements - Scalability needs - Integration requirements - Data storage needs - type: textarea id: mockups attributes: label: Mockups/Wireframes description: If applicable, provide mockups, wireframes, or visual examples placeholder: | Attach images or provide links to: - UI mockups - Workflow diagrams - API specifications - Architecture diagrams - type: checkboxes id: considerations attributes: label: Implementation Considerations description: Check all that apply to this feature options: - label: Requires database schema changes - label: Requires API changes (breaking or non-breaking) - label: Requires UI/UX changes - label: Affects security model - label: Requires new dependencies - label: Affects performance - label: Requires configuration changes - label: Affects existing workflows - type: textarea id: testing_strategy attributes: label: Testing Strategy description: How should this feature be tested? placeholder: | Consider: - Unit tests needed - Integration tests needed - Performance tests needed - User acceptance tests needed - Edge cases to consider - type: textarea id: documentation_needs attributes: label: Documentation Needs description: What documentation would need to be created or updated? placeholder: | - User guides - API documentation - Developer documentation - Configuration guides - Troubleshooting guides - type: dropdown id: breaking_changes attributes: label: Breaking Changes description: Would this feature require breaking changes? options: - No breaking changes expected - Minor breaking changes (with migration path) - Major breaking changes required - Unsure validations: required: true - type: textarea id: migration_plan attributes: label: Migration Plan description: If breaking changes are required, describe the migration plan placeholder: | If this feature requires breaking changes: - What would need to be migrated? - How would existing users transition? - What tools or scripts would be needed? - What deprecation timeline would be appropriate? - type: textarea id: success_metrics attributes: label: Success Metrics description: How would you measure the success of this feature? placeholder: | Examples: - Reduced time to complete workflow X by Y% - Increased user satisfaction score - Reduced support tickets for issue Z - Improved system performance metrics - type: textarea id: additional_context attributes: label: Additional Context description: Any additional context, research, or information placeholder: | - Links to relevant research or documentation - Examples from other systems - Business justification - Timeline considerations - Related features or dependencies