think-mcp

{"scenarioId":"accuracy-trace-001","userQuestion":"Walk me through solving this step by step - I need to figure out why our database queries are slow","expectedTool":"trace","acceptableTools":["trace","debug"],"actualToolCalled":"trace","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:00.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Step-by-step reasoning is core to trace. User explicitly requests walking through sequentially. However, debug could also be appropriate since this is a performance diagnosis problem. Trace chosen due to explicit 'walk me through' language emphasizing thought progression over systematic debugging."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-trace-002","userQuestion":"Let me think through this problem carefully. I need to decide whether to use a monolith or microservices","expectedTool":"trace","acceptableTools":["trace","decide"],"actualToolCalled":"decide","isCorrect":false,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:01.000Z","reasoningProvided":"While 'think through' suggests trace, the core task is making a decision between two options (monolith vs microservices). Decide is more appropriate as it structures decision criteria, options analysis, and recommendation. Trace would show thought progression but decide provides decision framework. Choose decide for decision-making focus."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-trace-003","userQuestion":"Help me reason through the implications of this architectural change, one thought at a time","expectedTool":"trace","acceptableTools":["trace"],"actualToolCalled":"trace","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:02.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit request for sequential reasoning 'one thought at a time' perfectly matches trace semantics. Analyzing implications requires progressive exploration with potential branching and revision. Trace is the precise tool for this reasoning pattern."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-model-001","userQuestion":"Apply first principles thinking to redesign our authentication system from scratch","expectedTool":"model","acceptableTools":["model"],"actualToolCalled":"model","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:03.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit request to apply named mental model (first principles). Model tool is designed for applying specific mental models to problems. Perfect match - breaking authentication down to fundamental truths and rebuilding."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-model-002","userQuestion":"What mental model should I use to analyze the cost-benefit of this infrastructure upgrade?","expectedTool":"model","acceptableTools":["model","decide"],"actualToolCalled":"model","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:04.000Z","reasoningProvided":"User explicitly asks for mental model selection. Model tool should recommend appropriate framework (opportunity cost, ROI analysis, etc.) for cost-benefit analysis. While decide could structure the decision, the request is specifically for mental model application."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-model-003","userQuestion":"Help me apply Occam's razor to simplify this overly complex solution","expectedTool":"model","acceptableTools":["model"],"actualToolCalled":"model","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:05.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Direct request to apply specific mental model (Occam's razor - simplest explanation). Model tool applies named mental models to problems. Clear and unambiguous model tool usage."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-pattern-001","userQuestion":"What design pattern should I use for handling multiple payment providers?","expectedTool":"pattern","acceptableTools":["pattern"],"actualToolCalled":"pattern","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:06.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit request for design pattern (likely Strategy or Adapter pattern for multiple implementations). Pattern tool provides implementation guidance for software design patterns. Perfect match."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-pattern-002","userQuestion":"How should I architect this service to handle state management across components?","expectedTool":"pattern","acceptableTools":["pattern","paradigm"],"actualToolCalled":"pattern","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:07.000Z","reasoningProvided":"State management pattern question. While paradigm could discuss reactive or functional approaches, pattern tool is more specific for implementation patterns (Redux, MobX, Context). Pattern chosen for concrete architectural guidance."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-pattern-003","userQuestion":"I need a pattern for integrating with external APIs that might be unreliable","expectedTool":"pattern","acceptableTools":["pattern"],"actualToolCalled":"pattern","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:08.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Request for integration pattern (Circuit Breaker, Retry, Timeout patterns). Pattern tool provides reliability patterns with implementation guidance. Clear pattern tool usage for resilience patterns."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-paradigm-001","userQuestion":"Should I use OOP or functional programming for this data transformation pipeline?","expectedTool":"paradigm","acceptableTools":["paradigm"],"actualToolCalled":"paradigm","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:09.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Direct comparison of programming paradigms (OOP vs functional). Paradigm tool explains benefits/tradeoffs of different programming approaches. Perfect match for paradigm selection guidance."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-paradigm-002","userQuestion":"What programming approach fits best for a real-time event processing system?","expectedTool":"paradigm","acceptableTools":["paradigm","pattern"],"actualToolCalled":"paradigm","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:10.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Programming approach question suggests paradigm (event-driven, reactive, concurrent). While pattern could provide specific implementation patterns, paradigm explains the fundamental approach and philosophy. Paradigm chosen for approach-level guidance."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-paradigm-003","userQuestion":"Help me understand if reactive programming is right for this use case","expectedTool":"paradigm","acceptableTools":["paradigm"],"actualToolCalled":"paradigm","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:11.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Evaluating reactive programming paradigm fit. Paradigm tool explains reactive benefits (async streams, backpressure) and tradeoffs (complexity, debugging) for specific context. Clear paradigm assessment request."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-debug-001","userQuestion":"Why is my code failing intermittently in production? Help me find the root cause","expectedTool":"debug","acceptableTools":["debug","hypothesis"],"actualToolCalled":"debug","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:12.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Debugging production failure - root cause analysis. Debug tool provides systematic debugging approaches (binary search, cause elimination). Hypothesis could test theories but debug is primary tool for systematic troubleshooting methodology."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-debug-002","userQuestion":"I have a memory leak somewhere in this application. How should I track it down?","expectedTool":"debug","acceptableTools":["debug"],"actualToolCalled":"debug","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:13.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Memory leak debugging - clear debugging task. Debug tool should provide systematic approach (divide and conquer, profiling, heap analysis). Direct debug tool usage."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-debug-003","userQuestion":"The login flow is broken but I can't figure out where. Can you help me debug systematically?","expectedTool":"debug","acceptableTools":["debug"],"actualToolCalled":"debug","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:14.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit request for systematic debugging. Debug tool provides structured debugging approaches (cause elimination, backtracking). User explicitly requests systematic debugging methodology."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-council-001","userQuestion":"I need multiple perspectives on whether we should migrate to Kubernetes","expectedTool":"council","acceptableTools":["council","decide"],"actualToolCalled":"council","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:15.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit request for multiple perspectives. Council tool simulates diverse expert viewpoints (architect, ops, developer) with different concerns. While decide structures the decision, council provides the multi-perspective analysis requested. Council is primary choice."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-council-002","userQuestion":"What would different experts say about this API versioning strategy?","expectedTool":"council","acceptableTools":["council"],"actualToolCalled":"council","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:16.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicitly asking for different expert opinions. Council tool is designed to present multiple expert personas with distinct perspectives. Perfect match for gathering diverse professional viewpoints."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-council-003","userQuestion":"Let's get diverse viewpoints on this security architecture decision","expectedTool":"council","acceptableTools":["council","decide"],"actualToolCalled":"council","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:17.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Request for diverse viewpoints on security decision. Council provides multiple expert perspectives (security architect, compliance, engineer). Decide could structure the decision but council addresses the diversity request. Council is more appropriate."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-decide-001","userQuestion":"Help me choose between AWS, GCP, and Azure for our infrastructure","expectedTool":"decide","acceptableTools":["decide","model"],"actualToolCalled":"decide","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:18.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Decision between three options (AWS/GCP/Azure). Decide tool structures decision with criteria, weighted analysis, and recommendation. Model could apply frameworks but decide is purpose-built for multi-option selection. Clear decide usage."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-decide-002","userQuestion":"What's the best decision here? I need to weigh the tradeoffs between speed and quality","expectedTool":"decide","acceptableTools":["decide"],"actualToolCalled":"decide","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:19.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit decision request with tradeoff analysis (speed vs quality). Decide tool structures criteria weighting and option evaluation. Direct decision-making scenario requiring structured framework."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-decide-003","userQuestion":"I need to make a structured decision about which database to use - help me analyze options","expectedTool":"decide","acceptableTools":["decide"],"actualToolCalled":"decide","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:20.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicitly requests structured decision for database selection. Decide tool provides decision framework with criteria, options analysis, and recommendation. User specifically asks for structured approach - perfect decide match."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-reflect-001","userQuestion":"Am I thinking about this correctly? I want to verify my assumptions about caching","expectedTool":"reflect","acceptableTools":["reflect","hypothesis"],"actualToolCalled":"reflect","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:21.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Metacognitive question - examining own reasoning and assumptions. Reflect tool assesses knowledge boundaries, confidence, and assumption validity. Hypothesis could test assumptions but reflect is designed for metacognitive assessment. Reflect is primary choice."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-reflect-002","userQuestion":"What am I missing in my reasoning about this performance optimization?","expectedTool":"reflect","acceptableTools":["reflect"],"actualToolCalled":"reflect","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:22.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit metacognitive query - identifying gaps in reasoning. Reflect tool designed to surface knowledge boundaries, blind spots, and areas of uncertainty. Perfect reflection tool usage for self-assessment."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-reflect-003","userQuestion":"Help me assess my knowledge gaps about Kubernetes networking","expectedTool":"reflect","acceptableTools":["reflect"],"actualToolCalled":"reflect","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:23.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Direct request for knowledge gap assessment. Reflect tool evaluates understanding, identifies known vs unknown areas, assesses confidence levels. Clear metacognitive monitoring scenario - perfect reflect usage."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-hypothesis-001","userQuestion":"Let me test my assumption that the bottleneck is in the database layer","expectedTool":"hypothesis","acceptableTools":["hypothesis","debug"],"actualToolCalled":"hypothesis","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:24.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Testing specific assumption through scientific method. Hypothesis tool structures observation, hypothesis formation, experimentation, and conclusion. Debug could find root cause but hypothesis is designed for testing specific theories. Hypothesis chosen for scientific validation approach."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-hypothesis-002","userQuestion":"How can I validate my theory about why users are abandoning checkout?","expectedTool":"hypothesis","acceptableTools":["hypothesis"],"actualToolCalled":"hypothesis","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:25.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Validating theory through scientific inquiry. Hypothesis tool provides framework for designing experiments, collecting data, and drawing conclusions. Clear hypothesis testing scenario requiring scientific method."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-hypothesis-003","userQuestion":"I think the issue is network latency - help me design an experiment to verify","expectedTool":"hypothesis","acceptableTools":["hypothesis","debug"],"actualToolCalled":"hypothesis","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:26.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit request to design experiment for verification. Hypothesis tool structures experimental design, controls, metrics, and validation. Debug could investigate but hypothesis is purpose-built for scientific testing. Hypothesis is correct choice."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-debate-001","userQuestion":"What are the arguments for and against using GraphQL vs REST?","expectedTool":"debate","acceptableTools":["debate","decide"],"actualToolCalled":"debate","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:27.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Request for arguments for/against - dialectical reasoning. Debate tool presents thesis (GraphQL benefits), antithesis (REST benefits), potential synthesis. Decide could structure decision but debate explores argumentation. Debate chosen for structured argumentation."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-debate-002","userQuestion":"Challenge my position that we should build this in-house instead of buying","expectedTool":"debate","acceptableTools":["debate"],"actualToolCalled":"debate","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:28.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicitly requesting challenge/counterargument. Debate tool provides antithesis to the build-in-house thesis. Dialectical reasoning to stress-test position. Perfect debate usage for adversarial testing of ideas."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-debate-003","userQuestion":"Present both sides of the serverless vs containers argument","expectedTool":"debate","acceptableTools":["debate","decide"],"actualToolCalled":"debate","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:29.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Request for both sides of argument - thesis and antithesis. Debate tool structures opposing arguments with premises and conclusions. Decide could make decision but debate focuses on argumentation structure. Debate is primary choice."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-map-001","userQuestion":"Help me visualize the data flow in this distributed system","expectedTool":"map","acceptableTools":["map"],"actualToolCalled":"map","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:30.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Explicit visualization request for data flow. Map tool creates visual diagrams (flowchart, sequence, architecture) to represent system structure and relationships. Perfect map usage for visual reasoning."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-map-002","userQuestion":"Draw out the relationships between these microservices","expectedTool":"map","acceptableTools":["map"],"actualToolCalled":"map","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:31.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Direct request to draw/visualize relationships. Map tool creates architecture diagrams showing service dependencies, communication patterns, and relationships. Clear map tool usage for visual representation."} {"scenarioId":"accuracy-map-003","userQuestion":"I need a diagram to understand the state transitions in this workflow","expectedTool":"map","acceptableTools":["map"],"actualToolCalled":"map","isCorrect":true,"isAcceptable":true,"timestamp":"2025-12-28T18:45:32.000Z","reasoningProvided":"Request for state transition diagram. Map tool creates state diagrams or flowcharts showing workflow states and transitions. Perfect visual reasoning scenario for map tool."}