# Critical Technical Debt and Functional Debt Analysis
**Date:** November 23, 2025
**Review Type:** Comprehensive PRD/FRD Compliance Audit
**Reviewer:** AI Code Reviewer
**Status:** CRITICAL - Immediate Action Required
---
## Executive Summary
This document provides a critical analysis of technical and functional debts in the MCP GitHub Project Manager against the documented PRD (`task-context-generation-prd.md`), README claims, and architecture documentation. **CRITICAL GAPS** have been identified between documented features and actual implementation.
### Severity Classification
- 🔴 **CRITICAL**: Core PRD features missing or broken
- 🟡 **HIGH**: Significant functionality gaps affecting usability
- 🟢 **MEDIUM**: Quality/performance improvements needed
- ⚪ **LOW**: Minor enhancements or optimizations
---
## Part 1: FUNCTIONAL DEBTS (Missing Features per PRD/FRD)
### 🔴 CRITICAL: FR-4 - Contextual References System (MISSING)
**PRD Requirement (Lines 114-127):**
- Extract relevant PRD sections with context explanations
- Link to related features and user stories
- Reference technical specifications and API docs
- Include similar implementation examples
**Current Status:** ❌ **NOT IMPLEMENTED**
**Root Cause Analysis:**
1. `ContextualReferencesSchema` exists in prompts but never used
2. No `ContextualReferenceGenerator` class implemented
3. `TaskContextGenerationService` doesn't call contextual reference generation
4. ParsePRDTool doesn't include contextual references in task output
**Impact:**
- Developers lack PRD section references in tasks
- No links to related features or technical specs
- Missing code examples and implementation patterns
- Violates PRD requirement for "complete reference system"
**Verification:**
```typescript
// src/services/TaskContextGenerationService.ts:45-72
// Only generates business and technical context
// No call to generateContextualReferences()
```
### 🔴 CRITICAL: FR-5 - Enhanced Acceptance Criteria (INCOMPLETE)
**PRD Requirement (Lines 128-141):**
- Create specific, measurable acceptance criteria
- Define verification methods for each criterion
- Categorize criteria by type (functional, technical, quality)
- Include priority levels for each criterion
**Current Status:** ⚠️ **PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED**
**Root Cause Analysis:**
1. `EnhancedAcceptanceCriteriaSchema` defined but not integrated
2. No acceptance criteria generation in task context flow
3. Basic acceptance criteria exist in tasks but not "enhanced"
4. Missing verification methods and categorization
**Gap Details:**
- ❌ No verification method specification (unit test, integration test, etc.)
- ❌ No priority levels (must_have, should_have, nice_to_have)
- ❌ No acceptance thresholds or success conditions
- ❌ No testing notes for QA teams
**Verification:**
```typescript
// src/domain/ai-types.ts
// EnhancedAcceptanceCriteria interface exists
// But not populated in TaskContextGenerationService
```
### 🔴 CRITICAL: FR-6 - Dependency Context Enhancement (MISSING)
**PRD Requirement (Lines 142-155):**
- Explain why dependencies exist
- Describe what dependent tasks provide
- Include integration guidance and interfaces
- Identify opportunities for parallel work
**Current Status:** ❌ **NOT IMPLEMENTED**
**Root Cause Analysis:**
1. Basic dependency detection exists (auto-detect)
2. No dependency rationale explanation
3. No integration guidance for dependencies
4. No parallel work opportunity identification
**Impact:**
- Tasks show dependencies but not WHY they exist
- No guidance on what dependent tasks must provide
- Missed opportunities for parallel development
- Poor developer experience understanding task order
### 🟡 HIGH: FR-3 - Implementation Guidance (INCOMPLETE)
**PRD Requirement (Lines 98-111):**
- Generate step-by-step implementation approach
- Recommend appropriate tools and technologies
- Identify common pitfalls and mitigation strategies
- Provide code examples and patterns where applicable
**Current Status:** ⚠️ **PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED**
**What's Implemented:**
- ✅ Basic implementation guidance generation
- ✅ Technical considerations extraction
- ✅ Best practices identification
**What's Missing:**
- ❌ Code examples generation (CodeExampleGenerator)
- ❌ Pitfall mitigation strategy details incomplete
- ❌ Tool recommendations not technology-stack aware
- ❌ Quality assurance section incomplete
**Gap Analysis:**
```typescript
// src/services/TaskContextGenerationService.ts:262-274
// transformImplementationGuidance() has incomplete mappings
// qualityAssurance and performanceOptimization are raw arrays
// Missing structured guidance per PRD schema
```
### 🟡 HIGH: Configuration Management Gaps
**PRD Requirements (Lines 390-412):**
```bash
ENHANCED_TASK_GENERATION=true
CONTEXT_GENERATION_LEVEL=full
INCLUDE_BUSINESS_CONTEXT=true
INCLUDE_TECHNICAL_CONTEXT=true
INCLUDE_IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDANCE=true
INCLUDE_CODE_EXAMPLES=true # ❌ MISSING
MAX_CONTEXT_TOKENS=2000 # ❌ MISSING
ENABLE_CONTEXT_CACHING=true # ❌ MISSING
```
**Current Implementation:**
- ✅ Most environment variables exist in src/env.ts
- ❌ `INCLUDE_CODE_EXAMPLES` not implemented
- ❌ `MAX_CONTEXT_TOKENS` not enforced
- ❌ `ENABLE_CONTEXT_CACHING` not implemented
**Root Cause:**
Configuration defined but validation and enforcement logic missing.
### 🟡 HIGH: Quality Metrics and Validation (MISSING)
**PRD Requirements (Lines 415-435):**
**Functional Requirements:**
- ✅ 100% of generated tasks include business context (conditional on config)
- ⚠️ 95% of tasks include relevant technical constraints (not measured)
- ❌ 90% of tasks include actionable implementation guidance (incomplete)
- ❌ 85% of tasks include relevant code examples (NOT IMPLEMENTED)
**Quality Metrics:**
- ❌ Context Completeness: 95% of required context fields populated (not tracked)
- ❌ Context Accuracy: 90% accuracy validated through developer feedback (no validation)
- ❌ Context Relevance: 85% rated as "highly relevant" (no rating system)
- ❌ Implementation Success: 80% completed without additional context requests (no tracking)
**Performance Metrics:**
- ❌ Generation Time: < 30 seconds per task (not measured)
- ❌ Token Efficiency: < 2000 tokens per task (not enforced)
- ❌ Cache Hit Rate: > 70% (no caching implemented)
- ❌ Error Rate: < 5% context generation failures (not tracked)
**Root Cause:**
No quality validation service or metrics collection system implemented.
---
## Part 2: TECHNICAL DEBTS (Implementation Gaps)
### 🔴 CRITICAL: Schema Completeness
**Issue:** Incomplete resource schemas in `src/domain/resource-schemas.ts`
**Problems Identified:**
```typescript
// Lines 79-91: PULL_REQUEST and FIELD schemas are stubs
[ResourceType.PULL_REQUEST]: BaseResourceSchema.extend({
type: z.literal(ResourceType.PULL_REQUEST),
title: z.string(),
description: z.string().optional(),
status: z.string() // ❌ Too simplistic
}),
[ResourceType.FIELD]: BaseResourceSchema.extend({
type: z.literal(ResourceType.FIELD),
name: z.string(),
fieldType: z.string() // ❌ Should be enum of GitHub field types
})
```
**Required Fix:**
1. Define complete PullRequestSchema with all GitHub PR fields
2. Define complete FieldSchema matching GitHub Projects v2 field types
3. Add validation for field values per type
4. Add schema versioning for migrations
### 🔴 CRITICAL: TaskExecutionContext Schema Missing
**Issue:** Enhanced task context fields not validated
**Current State:**
- `TaskExecutionContext` interface defined in `domain/ai-types.ts`
- No Zod schema for runtime validation
- No validation in `TaskContextGenerationService`
**Required Implementation:**
```typescript
// MISSING: src/domain/task-context-schemas.ts
export const TaskExecutionContextSchema = z.object({
businessObjective: z.string().min(20),
userImpact: z.string().min(20),
successMetrics: z.array(z.string()).min(1),
parentFeature: FeatureContextSchema,
technicalConstraints: z.array(z.string()),
architecturalDecisions: z.array(z.string()),
integrationPoints: z.array(z.string()),
dataRequirements: z.array(z.string()),
prdContextSummary: PRDContextSummarySchema,
// NEW FIELDS from PRD:
implementationGuidance: ImplementationGuidanceSchema.optional(),
contextualReferences: ContextualReferencesSchema.optional(),
enhancedAcceptanceCriteria: EnhancedAcceptanceCriteriaSchema.optional(),
dependencyContext: DependencyContextSchema.optional()
});
```
### 🟡 HIGH: Service Layer Incompleteness
**File:** `src/services/TaskContextGenerationService.ts`
**Missing Components:**
1. **ContextualReferenceGenerator** (FR-4)
```typescript
// MISSING CLASS
class ContextualReferenceGenerator {
async generateReferences(
task: AITask,
prd: PRDDocument
): Promise<ContextualReferences> {
// Extract PRD sections relevant to task
// Identify related features
// Generate code examples
// Link to technical specs
}
}
```
2. **CodeExampleGenerator** (FR-3 requirement)
```typescript
// MISSING CLASS
class CodeExampleGenerator {
async generateExamples(
task: AITask,
technicalContext: TechnicalContext
): Promise<CodeExample[]> {
// Generate relevant code snippets
// Pattern-based example generation
// Technology-specific examples
}
}
```
3. **ContextQualityValidator** (PRD Phase 4)
```typescript
// MISSING CLASS
class ContextQualityValidator {
validateCompleteness(context: TaskExecutionContext): ValidationResult {
// Check all required fields populated
// Verify minimum quality thresholds
// Return completeness score
}
validateAccuracy(context: TaskExecutionContext): ValidationResult {
// Validate context accuracy
// Check consistency across sections
// Return accuracy score
}
validateRelevance(context: TaskExecutionContext, task: AITask): ValidationResult {
// Assess relevance to task
// Check for irrelevant information
// Return relevance score
}
}
```
### 🟡 HIGH: Caching Infrastructure (Missing Persistence)
**Current State:** `src/infrastructure/cache/ResourceCache.ts`
- ✅ In-memory caching with TTL
- ✅ Tag-based indexing
- ✅ Resource type filtering
**Gaps:**
- ❌ No persistence across server restarts
- ❌ No distributed caching support
- ❌ No LRU/LFU eviction policies
- ❌ No cache warming on startup
- ❌ No cache statistics/monitoring
- ❌ No cache hit rate tracking
**Required Implementation:**
1. Create `ICacheProvider` interface for multiple backends
2. Implement `RedisCacheProvider` for persistence
3. Add `FileCacheProvider` for local development
4. Implement cache warming strategy
5. Add cache metrics collection
6. Implement eviction policies
### 🟡 HIGH: Event System Not Integrated
**Files Exist But Not Used:**
- `src/infrastructure/events/EventStore.ts` - Event persistence ✅ exists
- `src/infrastructure/events/GitHubWebhookHandler.ts` - Webhook handling ✅ exists
- `src/infrastructure/events/EventSubscriptionManager.ts` - Subscriptions ✅ exists
- `src/infrastructure/http/WebhookServer.ts` - HTTP server ✅ exists
**Problem:** None of these are integrated into the main application
**Root Cause:**
1. No initialization in `src/index.ts`
2. No webhook endpoint configuration
3. No event subscription in services
4. No documentation on how to enable
**Verification:**
```bash
grep -r "EventStore" src/index.ts
# Returns: No matches found
grep -r "WebhookServer" src/index.ts
# Returns: No matches found
```
### 🟢 MEDIUM: Test Coverage Gaps
**Missing Test Files:**
1. **ContextualReferencesGenerator.test.ts** - Doesn't exist (feature not implemented)
2. **CodeExampleGenerator.test.ts** - Doesn't exist (feature not implemented)
3. **ContextQualityValidator.test.ts** - Doesn't exist (feature not implemented)
4. **Enhanced context integration tests** - Partially exists
**Existing Tests:**
- ✅ `TaskContextGenerationService.test.ts` exists
- ✅ `TaskGenerationService.enhanced.test.ts` exists
- ✅ `ParsePRDTool.enhanced.test.ts` exists
**Coverage Gaps:**
- No performance benchmarks (PRD requires <30s generation time)
- No token usage tracking tests (PRD requires <2000 tokens)
- No cache hit rate tests (PRD requires >70%)
- No quality metrics validation tests
### 🟢 MEDIUM: Monitoring and Observability
**Missing Components:**
1. **Context Generation Metrics**
```typescript
// MISSING: src/infrastructure/monitoring/ContextMetrics.ts
interface ContextGenerationMetrics {
generationTime: number;
tokenUsage: number;
cacheHitRate: number;
errorRate: number;
completenessScore: number;
accuracyScore: number;
relevanceScore: number;
}
```
2. **Performance Tracking**
- No timing instrumentation in TaskContextGenerationService
- No token counting
- No cache hit/miss tracking
- No error rate calculation
3. **Health Checks**
- No /health endpoint
- No service status monitoring
- No AI provider availability checks
---
## Part 3: Documentation vs Reality Gaps
### 🔴 CRITICAL: README Claims vs Implementation
**README.md Lines 85-97: "Enhanced Task Context Generation"**
Claims marked as ✅ Complete:
1. ❌ "Traceability-Based Context (Default)" - ✅ TRUE
2. ❌ "AI-Enhanced Context (Optional)" - ⚠️ PARTIAL (only business + technical)
3. ❌ "Configurable Context Levels" - ⚠️ PARTIAL (not all levels work)
4. ❌ "Business Context" - ✅ TRUE
5. ❌ "Technical Context" - ✅ TRUE
6. ❌ "Implementation Guidance" - ⚠️ PARTIAL (incomplete)
7. ❌ "Contextual References" - ❌ FALSE (not implemented)
8. ❌ "Enhanced Acceptance Criteria" - ❌ FALSE (not integrated)
9. ❌ "Graceful Degradation" - ✅ TRUE
**Accuracy: 44% (4/9 features fully working)**
### 🟡 HIGH: STATUS.md vs Reality
**STATUS.md Lines 48-58: "Field Value Enhancement (Completed)"**
- Claims 100% GitHub Project v2 field type coverage
- ✅ This is accurate (verified in code)
**STATUS.md Lines 60-67: "Current Priorities"**
- Lists "Implement MCP Resources" as high priority
- But resources ARE already implemented
- **Stale documentation**
### 🟢 MEDIUM: Architecture Documentation
**ARCHITECTURE.md Lines 183-191: "Next Steps"**
Listed as next steps but already done:
1. ✅ Implement structured logging (exists)
2. ❌ Add caching layer (exists but incomplete)
3. ❌ Add rate limiting (exists but not integrated)
4. ❌ Add metrics collection (NOT IMPLEMENTED)
5. ❌ Implement circuit breaker (NOT IMPLEMENTED)
6. ❌ Add request tracing (NOT IMPLEMENTED)
---
## Part 4: Root Cause Analysis
### Primary Root Causes
#### 1. **Incomplete PRD Implementation** 🔴
- **Symptom:** FR-4, FR-5, FR-6 missing or incomplete
- **Root Cause:** Development stopped at Phase 2 of 4-phase PRD plan
- **Evidence:**
- PRD defines 12-week 4-phase implementation
- Only Phases 1-2 completed (~7 weeks work)
- Phases 3-4 (Advanced Enhancement, Quality) not done
#### 2. **Schema-Service Mismatch** 🔴
- **Symptom:** Schemas defined but not used in services
- **Root Cause:** Schema-first design not followed through to implementation
- **Evidence:**
- `ContextualReferencesSchema` exists but never called
- `EnhancedAcceptanceCriteriaSchema` exists but not integrated
- Zod schemas in prompts not validated in service layer
#### 3. **Infrastructure Exists But Not Integrated** 🟡
- **Symptom:** EventStore, WebhookServer exist but unused
- **Root Cause:** Components built but integration skipped
- **Evidence:**
- No imports in `src/index.ts`
- No configuration in environment
- No documentation on enabling
#### 4. **Testing Incomplete** 🟡
- **Symptom:** High-level tests exist but component tests missing
- **Root Cause:** Test-driven development not followed
- **Evidence:**
- 22 test files but many components untested
- No tests for missing features (can't test what doesn't exist)
- No performance/quality metric tests
#### 5. **Documentation-Code Drift** 🟢
- **Symptom:** Documentation claims features that don't exist
- **Root Cause:** Documentation written before implementation completed
- **Evidence:**
- README claims 100% complete but implementation is ~50%
- STATUS.md has stale "Current Priorities"
- PRD describes features not implemented
---
## Part 5: Impact Assessment
### Business Impact
1. **Developer Experience (CRITICAL)**
- Missing contextual references means developers must hunt for PRD sections
- No code examples means slower implementation
- Incomplete acceptance criteria means unclear definition of done
- **Estimated Impact:** 30-40% productivity loss (matches PRD problem statement)
2. **Quality Impact (HIGH)**
- Missing enhanced acceptance criteria leads to implementation variance
- No quality validation means undetected low-quality context
- No metrics means no continuous improvement
- **Estimated Impact:** 40% of bugs from misunderstood requirements (per PRD)
3. **Onboarding Impact (HIGH)**
- Missing implementation guidance slows new developer onboarding
- No dependency context makes understanding task order difficult
- **Estimated Impact:** 2-3x longer onboarding time (per PRD)
### Technical Impact
1. **System Reliability (MEDIUM)**
- In-memory cache = data loss on restart
- No cache eviction = potential memory leaks
- No metrics = no visibility into issues
2. **Scalability (MEDIUM)**
- In-memory cache doesn't scale across instances
- No distributed caching support
- Event system exists but not used
3. **Maintainability (HIGH)**
- Code-documentation drift makes onboarding difficult
- Missing tests make refactoring risky
- Incomplete features create confusion
---
## Part 6: Prioritized Fix Plan
### Phase 1: CRITICAL Fixes (Schema → Backend) - Week 1-2
#### 1.1 Schema Fixes (Days 1-2)
**Priority:** 🔴 CRITICAL
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Create complete TaskExecutionContext schema with validation
✓ Fix PULL_REQUEST schema with all GitHub PR fields
✓ Fix FIELD schema with proper GitHub Projects v2 field types
✓ Add schema validation to TaskContextGenerationService
✓ Create validation utilities for context quality
```
**Files to Create/Modify:**
- `src/domain/task-context-schemas.ts` (NEW)
- `src/domain/resource-schemas.ts` (MODIFY)
- `src/domain/ai-types.ts` (MODIFY - add runtime validation)
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- All schemas have Zod validation
- Runtime validation in all service methods
- Schema version field for future migrations
- Tests: 100% schema validation coverage
#### 1.2 Complete FR-4: Contextual References (Days 3-5)
**Priority:** 🔴 CRITICAL
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Implement ContextualReferenceGenerator class
✓ Integrate with TaskContextGenerationService
✓ Add PRD section extraction logic
✓ Implement related feature identification
✓ Add technical spec linking
✓ Update ParsePRDTool to include contextual references
```
**Files to Create/Modify:**
- `src/services/context/ContextualReferenceGenerator.ts` (NEW)
- `src/services/TaskContextGenerationService.ts` (MODIFY)
- `src/infrastructure/tools/ai-tasks/ParsePRDTool.ts` (MODIFY)
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- PRD sections extracted with relevance scoring
- Related features identified and linked
- Technical specs referenced in context
- Tests: Unit + integration tests passing
- Performance: <5s generation time
#### 1.3 Complete FR-5: Enhanced Acceptance Criteria (Days 6-8)
**Priority:** 🔴 CRITICAL
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Integrate EnhancedAcceptanceCriteriaSchema into pipeline
✓ Implement acceptance criteria generation in context service
✓ Add verification method specification
✓ Add priority levels and categorization
✓ Update task output to include enhanced criteria
```
**Files to Modify:**
- `src/services/TaskContextGenerationService.ts`
- `src/services/ai/prompts/ContextGenerationPrompts.ts`
- `src/domain/ai-types.ts`
- `src/infrastructure/tools/ai-tasks/ParsePRDTool.ts`
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- All criteria have verification methods
- Priority levels (must/should/nice-to-have) assigned
- Categorized by type (functional/technical/quality)
- Tests: Criteria generation validated
- Output: Tasks include enhanced criteria
#### 1.4 Complete FR-6: Dependency Context (Days 9-10)
**Priority:** 🔴 CRITICAL
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Add dependency rationale explanation to AI prompts
✓ Generate integration guidance for dependencies
✓ Identify parallel work opportunities
✓ Add dependency context to task output
```
**Files to Create/Modify:**
- `src/services/context/DependencyContextGenerator.ts` (NEW)
- `src/services/TaskContextGenerationService.ts` (MODIFY)
- `src/services/ai/prompts/ContextGenerationPrompts.ts` (MODIFY)
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- Each dependency has WHY explanation
- Integration interfaces documented
- Parallel opportunities identified
- Tests: Dependency analysis validated
### Phase 2: HIGH Priority Fixes (Backend Completion) - Week 3
#### 2.1 Implement Code Example Generator (Days 1-3)
**Priority:** 🟡 HIGH
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Create CodeExampleGenerator service
✓ Integrate with implementation guidance
✓ Add technology stack detection
✓ Generate pattern-based examples
✓ Update INCLUDE_CODE_EXAMPLES configuration
```
**Files to Create:**
- `src/services/context/CodeExampleGenerator.ts`
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- Code examples generated for common patterns
- Examples match task technology stack
- Syntactically correct code
- Tests: Example generation validated
#### 2.2 Implement Context Quality Validation (Days 4-5)
**Priority:** 🟡 HIGH
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Create ContextQualityValidator service
✓ Implement completeness scoring
✓ Implement accuracy validation
✓ Implement relevance scoring
✓ Add quality gates to context generation
```
**Files to Create:**
- `src/services/validation/ContextQualityValidator.ts`
- `src/services/validation/QualityMetrics.ts`
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- Completeness: >95% of fields populated
- Accuracy validation logic implemented
- Relevance scoring functional
- Quality reports generated
- Tests: All validators tested
### Phase 3: Infrastructure Improvements - Week 4
#### 3.1 Implement Persistent Caching (Days 1-2)
**Priority:** 🟡 HIGH
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Create ICacheProvider interface
✓ Implement FileCacheProvider for dev
✓ Implement RedisCacheProvider for production
✓ Add cache warming on startup
✓ Implement LRU eviction policy
✓ Add MAX_CONTEXT_TOKENS enforcement
✓ Add ENABLE_CONTEXT_CACHING implementation
```
**Files to Create/Modify:**
- `src/infrastructure/cache/ICacheProvider.ts` (NEW)
- `src/infrastructure/cache/FileCacheProvider.ts` (NEW)
- `src/infrastructure/cache/RedisCacheProvider.ts` (NEW)
- `src/infrastructure/cache/ResourceCache.ts` (MODIFY)
#### 3.2 Integrate Event System (Days 3-4)
**Priority:** 🟡 HIGH
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Initialize EventStore in main application
✓ Configure WebhookServer
✓ Add event subscriptions to services
✓ Document webhook configuration
✓ Add environment variables for webhook
```
**Files to Modify:**
- `src/index.ts`
- `.env.example`
- `README.md`
#### 3.3 Implement Monitoring (Day 5)
**Priority:** 🟢 MEDIUM
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Create ContextGenerationMetrics service
✓ Add timing instrumentation
✓ Add token counting
✓ Add cache hit/miss tracking
✓ Add error rate calculation
✓ Create /health endpoint
```
**Files to Create:**
- `src/infrastructure/monitoring/ContextMetrics.ts`
- `src/infrastructure/monitoring/HealthCheck.ts`
### Phase 4: Testing and Documentation - Week 5
#### 4.1 Complete Test Coverage (Days 1-3)
**Priority:** 🟡 HIGH
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Add ContextualReferenceGenerator tests
✓ Add CodeExampleGenerator tests
✓ Add ContextQualityValidator tests
✓ Add enhanced context integration tests
✓ Add performance benchmark tests
✓ Add cache provider tests
✓ Target: 90% code coverage
```
#### 4.2 Update Documentation (Days 4-5)
**Priority:** 🟡 HIGH
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Update README.md with accurate feature status
✓ Update STATUS.md to reflect reality
✓ Create ADRs for key decisions
✓ Update API documentation
✓ Add troubleshooting guide
✓ Update configuration guide
```
**Files to Update:**
- `README.md`
- `STATUS.md`
- `ARCHITECTURE.md`
- `docs/ai-features.md`
### Phase 5: Validation and Metrics - Week 6
#### 5.1 Validate PRD Compliance (Days 1-2)
**Validate Against PRD Requirements:**
```
✓ FR-1: Business Context Extraction - VALIDATE
✓ FR-2: Technical Context Analysis - VALIDATE
✓ FR-3: Implementation Guidance - VALIDATE
✓ FR-4: Contextual References - VALIDATE (NEW)
✓ FR-5: Enhanced Acceptance Criteria - VALIDATE (NEW)
✓ FR-6: Dependency Context - VALIDATE (NEW)
```
**Validate Success Metrics:**
```
✓ 100% tasks have business context
✓ 95% tasks have technical constraints
✓ 90% tasks have implementation guidance
✓ 85% tasks have code examples
```
**Validate Quality Metrics:**
```
✓ Context completeness >95%
✓ Context accuracy >90%
✓ Context relevance >85%
✓ Implementation success >80%
```
**Validate Performance Metrics:**
```
✓ Generation time <30s per task
✓ Token usage <2000 per task
✓ Cache hit rate >70%
✓ Error rate <5%
```
#### 5.2 Production Readiness (Days 3-5)
**Tasks:**
```
✓ Run full test suite
✓ Run performance benchmarks
✓ Validate all metrics
✓ Security audit
✓ Documentation review
✓ Deployment guide
```
---
## Part 7: Success Criteria
### Technical Success Criteria
✅ **Schema Layer:**
- All resource schemas complete with proper validation
- Task context schemas with runtime validation
- Schema versioning implemented
- 100% schema test coverage
✅ **Service Layer:**
- All PRD features (FR-1 through FR-6) fully implemented
- Quality validation service operational
- Code example generation functional
- Performance within PRD targets
✅ **Infrastructure:**
- Persistent caching with Redis support
- Event system integrated and documented
- Monitoring and metrics collection active
- Health checks implemented
✅ **Testing:**
- 90% code coverage
- All unit tests passing
- All integration tests passing
- Performance benchmarks documented
✅ **Documentation:**
- README accurate (no false claims)
- All features documented
- ADRs for major decisions
- Configuration fully documented
### PRD Compliance Criteria
✅ **Functional Requirements:**
- FR-1: Business Context ✅
- FR-2: Technical Context ✅
- FR-3: Implementation Guidance ✅
- FR-4: Contextual References ✅
- FR-5: Enhanced Acceptance Criteria ✅
- FR-6: Dependency Context ✅
✅ **Quality Metrics:**
- Context Completeness: >95%
- Context Accuracy: >90%
- Context Relevance: >85%
- Implementation Success: >80%
✅ **Performance Metrics:**
- Generation Time: <30s
- Token Efficiency: <2000
- Cache Hit Rate: >70%
- Error Rate: <5%
---
## Part 8: Risk Assessment
### Implementation Risks
**HIGH RISK:**
1. **Token Budget for Code Examples**
- Risk: Code generation may exceed 2000 token budget
- Mitigation: Implement token counting and limits
- Fallback: Skip code examples if budget exceeded
2. **AI Provider Availability**
- Risk: Enhanced features depend on AI availability
- Mitigation: Already has graceful fallback
- Enhancement: Improve fallback quality
**MEDIUM RISK:**
1. **Cache Performance**
- Risk: Redis dependency adds complexity
- Mitigation: File-based cache fallback for dev
- Testing: Performance benchmarks required
2. **Event System Integration**
- Risk: Breaking existing functionality
- Mitigation: Feature flag for webhook enable/disable
- Testing: Comprehensive integration tests
**LOW RISK:**
1. **Documentation Updates**
- Risk: Documentation drift continues
- Mitigation: Automated documentation generation
- Process: Documentation review in PR process
---
## Conclusion
This analysis reveals **significant gaps** between PRD specifications and current implementation. The project is approximately **50% complete** against the documented PRD, with critical features (FR-4, FR-5, FR-6) missing entirely.
### Key Takeaways:
1. **Functional Debt:** 3 of 6 core PRD features incomplete or missing
2. **Technical Debt:** Schema validation, caching, monitoring all need work
3. **Documentation Debt:** README overstates actual capabilities
4. **Testing Debt:** Missing tests for unimplemented features
### Recommended Action:
**Execute the 6-week phased fix plan** outlined in Part 6, focusing on:
- Week 1-2: Critical schema and service fixes
- Week 3: Backend completion
- Week 4: Infrastructure improvements
- Week 5: Testing and documentation
- Week 6: Validation and production readiness
### Expected Outcome:
After implementing this plan:
- ✅ 100% PRD compliance
- ✅ All documented features actually working
- ✅ Production-ready quality and performance
- ✅ Comprehensive testing and monitoring
- ✅ Accurate, trustworthy documentation
---
**Report End**