FigmaMind MCP Server

by joao-loker
Verified
# Figma API Limitations and Solutions This document describes the main limitations encountered when working with the Figma API during the development of FigmaMind, as well as the solutions implemented to overcome them. ## Encountered Limitations ### 1. Access to Design Styles and Variables **Problem:** The Figma API does not provide direct access to the actual values of design variables. When a component uses variables for colors, typography, or other styles, the API returns only a reference to the variable, not its concrete value. **Impact:** This makes it difficult to precisely extract visual styles such as colors, typography, and effects, resulting in incomplete data for interface reconstruction. ### 2. Complex Hierarchical Structure **Problem:** The Figma API data structure is deeply nested and contains many redundancies. Components can appear multiple times at different hierarchy levels. **Impact:** This results in component duplication in the processed JSON and makes it difficult to identify the real interface structure. ### 3. Asset Export **Problem:** The Figma API requires multiple steps to export images and icons: 1. First, request image URLs for specific nodes 2. Then, download the images from these URLs 3. The API does not offer automatic detection of the most suitable format (SVG vs PNG) **Impact:** The process is slow and can result in quality loss for vector icons if exported as PNG. ### 4. Component Type Identification **Problem:** The Figma API does not provide clear metadata about a component's type or function. Identification primarily depends on names and structure. **Impact:** Difficult automatic categorization of components such as buttons, inputs, etc., leading to imprecise classifications. ### 5. Missing State Information **Problem:** The Figma API does not facilitate access to different component states (hover, pressed, disabled) unless they are explicitly created as variants. **Impact:** Important information for interactivity is lost in the transformation. ### 6. Request Rate Limitation **Problem:** The Figma API has strict request rate limits, especially for image export. **Impact:** Slow processing for files with many components and assets. ## Implemented Solutions ### 1. Enhanced Style Extraction **Solution:** We implemented specialized functions to extract style information directly from nodes, even when they use variables: ```javascript function extractColorInfo(component) { // Color extraction from fills and strokes } function extractTextStyle(component) { // Text style extraction } function extractEffects(component) { // Shadows and other effects extraction } function extractCornerRadius(component) { // Rounded corners extraction } ``` These functions directly analyze the available properties in each node, extracting as much visual information as possible, even when the specific variable values are not accessible. ### 2. Component Redundancy Reduction **Solution:** We implemented an intelligent system to filter duplicate or nested components: ```javascript function filterDuplicateComponents(components) { // Tracking components by ID // Analysis of parent-child relationships // Filtering redundant components } ``` This system analyzes the component hierarchy and removes duplicates, preserving the logical structure of the interface. ### 3. Intelligent Asset Export **Solution:** We developed a system to automatically determine the most appropriate format for each asset: ```javascript function isImageNode(node) { // Detection of nodes that are images or icons } function shouldExportAsSvg(node) { // Decision on export format based on node characteristics } async function extractComponentAssets(fileKey, component) { // Identification and export of images in the most suitable format } ``` This approach ensures that vector icons are exported as SVG to preserve quality, while photos and complex images are exported as PNG. ### 4. Enhanced Component Identification **Solution:** We enhanced the component type identification system using name analysis, structure, and visual characteristics: ```javascript function identifyComponentType(component) { // Component name analysis // Structure and properties consideration // Specific type identification (button, input, header, etc.) } ``` Additionally, we implemented specific transformers for each component type, extracting properties relevant to their function. ### 5. Logical Section Organization **Solution:** We implemented an algorithm to group components into logical sections based on their vertical position and type: ```javascript function groupComponentsIntoSections(components) { // Grouping based on vertical position // Identification of sections like Header, Input, Button Area, Keyboard // Prevention of duplication between sections } ``` This approach facilitates understanding the interface structure, even without access to the original Figma hierarchy. ### 6. Request Optimization **Solution:** We implemented strategies to reduce the number of API requests: 1. Batch processing of assets to minimize API calls 2. Local cache of already downloaded images 3. Prior verification of existing files before making new requests ```javascript async function downloadImage(nodeId, fileKey, format, scale) { // Local cache check before downloading // Reuse of already downloaded assets } ``` ## Conclusion Although the Figma API presents significant limitations for complete design extraction, our implementation manages to overcome many of these restrictions through intelligent analysis of the available data. The solutions developed allow us to extract relevant visual and structural information for interface reconstruction, even when the API data is incomplete. The result is a robust system that transforms complex Figma data into an optimized JSON structure, containing essential information about layout, components, styles, and assets, facilitating precise interface reconstruction on different platforms.