We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jacksteamdev/obsidian-mcp-tools'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server
pull_request_template.mdβ’2.27 KiB
<!--
π¨ READ FIRST: https://github.com/jacksteamdev/obsidian-mcp-tools/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
This is a FREE project maintained by volunteers. Be respectful and patient.
Rude, demanding, or entitled behavior results in immediate bans.
Join Discord for discussions: https://discord.gg/q59pTrN9AA
-->
## Pull Request Description
**Clear description of what this PR changes and why**
## Type of Change
- [ ] π Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
- [ ] β¨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
- [ ] π₯ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
- [ ] π Documentation update
- [ ] π§ Internal/tooling change
## Testing
**How has this been tested?**
- [ ] Local Obsidian vault testing
- [ ] MCP server functionality verified
- [ ] Claude Desktop integration tested
- [ ] Cross-platform testing (if applicable)
## Architecture Compliance
- [ ] Follows feature-based architecture patterns (see `/docs/project-architecture.md`)
- [ ] Uses ArkType for runtime validation where applicable
- [ ] Implements proper error handling
- [ ] Includes setup function for new features
- [ ] Follows coding standards in `.clinerules`
## Checklist
- [ ] My code follows the project's coding standards
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to documentation (if applicable)
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
## Security Considerations
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets or API keys
- [ ] Input validation implemented where needed
- [ ] No new security vulnerabilities introduced
- [ ] Follows minimum permission principles
## Additional Context
<!--
- Screenshots (if UI changes)
- Performance considerations
- Backward compatibility notes
- Related issues or PRs
-->
## For Maintainers
**Review checklist:**
- [ ] Code quality and architecture compliance
- [ ] Security review completed
- [ ] Tests adequate and passing
- [ ] Documentation updated as needed
- [ ] Ready for release
---
**Remember**: This is volunteer work. Be patient during the review process.