Kaiza MCP Server

# Security Policy ## Supported Versions | Version | Supported | Security Updates | |---------|------------|-------------------| | 2.0.x | ✅ | ✅ | | 1.0.x | ✅ | ✅ | | 0.9.x | ❌ | ❌ | | < 0.9 | ❌ | ❌ | ## Reporting a Vulnerability ### Private Disclosure Process **Do not open a public issue for security vulnerabilities.** Instead, please send an email to: **security@ATLAS-GATE-MCP.org** ### What to Include Please include the following information in your report: - **Vulnerability Type**: What type of vulnerability it is - **Affected Versions**: Which versions are affected - **Impact Assessment**: What the impact of the vulnerability is - **Proof of Concept**: Steps to reproduce the vulnerability (if safe) - **Mitigation Suggestions**: Any suggested mitigations ### Response Timeline - **Initial Response**: Within 48 hours - **Detailed Assessment**: Within 7 days - **Patch Release**: Within 14 days (for critical vulnerabilities) - **Public Disclosure**: After patch is available (typically 30 days) ### Security Team The KAIZA MCP security team includes: - Security engineers - Core developers - External security advisors (when needed) ## Security Features ### Built-in Security Controls ATLAS-GATE-MCP includes several security features: - **Zero-Trust Architecture**: No implicit trust assumptions - **Role-Based Access Control**: Granular permission management - **Plan-Based Authorization**: All changes require approved plans - **Cryptographic Audit Logging**: Immutable operation history - **Content Integrity Verification**: SHA256-based content verification - **MCP-Only Sandbox** (v2.0): Process-level lockdown prevents filesystem/shell access - **Tool Parameter Enforcement** (v2.0): Strict validation at MCP boundary ### Security Best Practices Users should follow these security practices: 1. **Keep Software Updated**: Always use the latest version 2. **Secure Configuration**: Use secure defaults and configurations 3. **Regular Audits**: Review audit logs regularly 4. **Principle of Least Privilege**: Grant minimum necessary permissions 5. **Monitor for Anomalies**: Watch for unusual activity ## Security Audits ### Internal Audits The KAIZA MCP team conducts regular security audits: - **Code Reviews**: Security-focused code reviews - **Penetration Testing**: Regular penetration testing - **Dependency Scanning**: Automated vulnerability scanning - **Configuration Audits**: Security configuration reviews ### External Audits Third-party security audits are conducted: - **Annually**: Comprehensive security assessment - **Before Major Releases**: Security validation for new features - **After Security Incidents**: Post-incident security reviews ## Security Incident Response ### Incident Classification - **Critical**: System compromise, data breach, or widespread impact - **High**: Significant security vulnerability or limited impact - **Medium**: Moderate security issue with minimal impact - **Low**: Minor security issue with no immediate impact ### Response Process 1. **Detection**: Security issue identified 2. **Assessment**: Impact and severity evaluated 3. **Containment**: Immediate mitigation implemented 4. **Eradication**: Root cause addressed 5. **Recovery**: Systems restored to normal operation 6. **Lessons Learned**: Post-incident review and improvements ### Communication - **Internal**: Immediate notification to security team - **Users**: Public disclosure after patch availability - **Stakeholders**: Regular updates during incident response - **Community**: Transparent communication about impacts ## Security Rewards ### Bug Bounty Program KAIZA MCP offers rewards for security vulnerability reports: - **Critical**: Up to $5,000 - **High**: Up to $2,000 - **Medium**: Up to $500 - **Low**: Up to $100 ### Eligibility Requirements - **Private Disclosure**: Report vulnerabilities privately - **Original Research**: Must be original discovery - **Detailed Report**: Include sufficient technical details - **No Exploitation**: Do not exploit the vulnerability ### Reward Process 1. **Submission**: Send detailed report to security@ATLAS-GATE-MCP.org 2. **Validation**: Security team validates the vulnerability 3. **Assessment**: Impact and severity assessed 4. **Reward**: Reward amount determined and paid 5. **Recognition**: Contributor acknowledged (with permission) ## Security Contacts ### Primary Contact - **Email**: security@ATLAS-GATE-MCP.org - **PGP Key**: Available on request ### Emergency Contact - **Email**: emergency@ATLAS-GATE-MCP.org - **Response Time**: Within 24 hours ### General Inquiries - **Email**: info@ATLAS-GATE-MCP.org - **GitHub Issues**: Non-security issues only ## Security Resources ### Documentation - [MCP Sandbox Enforcement](./MCP_SANDBOX_ENFORCEMENT.md) — Process-level lockdown (v2.0) - [Tool Parameter Enforcement](./TOOL_ENFORCEMENT.md) — Parameter validation (v2.0) - [Enforcement Summary](./ENFORCEMENT_SUMMARY.md) — Complete enforcement overview - [Enforcement Quick Start](./ENFORCEMENT_QUICKSTART.md) — Developer guide - [Documentation Index](./DOCUMENTATION_INDEX.md) — All documentation ### Tools - [Security Scanner](./tools/security-scanner.js) - [Audit Log Analyzer](./tools/audit-analyzer.js) - [Configuration Validator](./tools/config-validator.js) ### Community - [Security Discussions](https://github.com/dylanmarriner/ATLAS-GATE-MCP-server/discussions/categories/security) - [Security Advisory Board](https://github.com/dylanmarriner/ATLAS-GATE-MCP-server/wiki/Security-Advisory-Board) ## Compliance ### Standards Compliance KAIZA MCP complies with: - **OWASP Top 10**: Web application security risks - **NIST Cybersecurity Framework**: Security best practices - **ISO 27001**: Information security management - **SOC 2**: Security controls and processes ### Certifications - **In Progress**: SOC 2 Type II certification - **Planned**: ISO 27001 certification - **Targeted**: Common Criteria certification --- **Last Updated**: 2026-01-31 **Security Team**: security@ATLAS-GATE-MCP.org **Version**: 2.0.0 (MCP-Only Sandbox Enforcement) **Status**: Production-Ready