# CVE Loading Benchmark Results
**Date**: November 26, 2025
**Test Environment**: Ubuntu Linux, Docker
## Executive Summary
**Winner: Git Clone Method** - 342x faster than GitHub API once repository is cloned.
## Methods Tested
1. **GitHub API (Individual Files)**: Current implementation
2. **Git Clone (Local Parsing)**: New optimized method
## Results
### Speed Comparison (500 CVEs)
| Method | Time | Speed | Winner |
|--------|------|-------|--------|
| GitHub API | 62.5 sec | 8 CVEs/sec | |
| Git Clone | 0.18 sec | 2,735 CVEs/sec | |
**Speed Improvement: 342x faster**
### Full Dataset Projections (240,000 CVEs)
| Method | Estimated Time | Estimated Size |
|--------|---------------|----------------|
| GitHub API | 8.3 hours | 156 MB |
| Git Clone | 1.5 minutes | 189 MB |
### Initial Setup Cost
- **Git Clone**: 5 minutes (one-time repository clone)
- **GitHub API**: None
### Space Efficiency
- **GitHub API**: 680 bytes/CVE
- **Git Clone**: 827 bytes/CVE (+22% larger, negligible difference)
## Recommendation
**Use Git Clone method for:**
- Initial database population
- Full dataset loads
- Bulk updates
**Total time for 240K CVEs:**
- Clone repo: ~5 minutes
- Load all CVEs: ~1.5 minutes
- **Total: ~6.5 minutes** vs 8.3 hours with API
**Final database size: ~190 MB** (acceptable)
## Raw Benchmark Data
[See full benchmark output in benchmarks/ directory]