Hostaway MCP Server

# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME] **Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` **Created**: [DATE] **Status**: Draft **Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS" ## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)* <!-- IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance. Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them, you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value. Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical. Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be: - Developed independently - Tested independently - Deployed independently - Demonstrated to users independently --> ### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1) [Describe this user journey in plain language] **Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level] **Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"] **Acceptance Scenarios**: 1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome] 2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome] --- ### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2) [Describe this user journey in plain language] **Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level] **Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently] **Acceptance Scenarios**: 1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome] --- ### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3) [Describe this user journey in plain language] **Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level] **Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently] **Acceptance Scenarios**: 1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome] --- [Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority] ### Edge Cases <!-- ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders. Fill them out with the right edge cases. --> - What happens when [boundary condition]? - How does system handle [error scenario]? ## Requirements *(mandatory)* <!-- ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders. Fill them out with the right functional requirements. --> ### Functional Requirements - **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"] - **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"] - **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"] - **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"] - **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"] *Example of marking unclear requirements:* - **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?] - **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified] ### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)* - **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation] - **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities] ## Success Criteria *(mandatory)* <!-- ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria. These must be technology-agnostic and measurable. --> ### Measurable Outcomes - **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"] - **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"] - **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"] - **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]