AI MCP Gateway

MikroTik Configuration Analysis — Plan Purpose - Provide automated analysis of generated or existing MikroTik RouterOS configurations. - Detect performance issues, common misconfigurations, and security/operational risks. - Offer actionable remediation suggestions and safe, idempotent commands where possible. Analysis Types 1. Performance Analysis - Check for suboptimal MTU, mismatched MTU across L2/L3 causing fragmentation. - Detect excessive bridge/filtering rules that can cause CPU spikes. - Identify interfaces in high-utilization patterns (requires telemetry integration). - Suggest batching or rate-limiting changes that could reduce impact. 2. Error / Safety Analysis - Find conflicting VLAN/PVID assignments (same interface assigned different PVIDs). - Detect missing bridge ports, or applying VLAN filtering without bridge settings. - Warn about non-idempotent commands (like removing interfaces) and recommend safer alternatives. - Flag operations requiring reboot or service disruption. 3. Security Analysis - Detect default/weak credentials (if config includes password placeholders). - Check for open management interfaces on WAN-facing ports. - Suggest minimizing exposure and enabling secure access (SSH keys, firewall rules). 4. Best-practice Hints - Use explicit names and comments in scripts. - Prefer `set` over `add` when possible to maintain idempotence. - Group related changes into single transaction where supported. Suggested UI Workflow - "Analyze config" button alongside "Generate with AI". - Show categorized findings: Performance / Errors / Security / Suggestions. - Each finding includes: severity (low/medium/high), explanation, suggested remediation commands (if safe) and a single-click copy-to-clipboard. - Allow user to preview remediation commands before execution. Implementation Notes - Analysis can be implemented in backend as an additional step in `generateDeploymentCommands` or as a separate endpoint `/v1/deployments/analyze`. - Use rule-based checks first (fast, deterministic). Augment with LLM-based interpretation for fuzzy checks and remediation wording. - Keep all analysis results idempotent and conservative: do not propose destructive commands automatically. Example Findings & Fixes - Finding: "Interface ether2 has MTU 1500 but bonded interfaces are set to 9000" - Severity: medium - Explanation: mixed MTU can cause fragmentation and connectivity issues. - Suggested fix: /interface ethernet set mtu=9000 [find name="ether2"] - Suggest running this during maintenance window. - Finding: "Bridge 'br-lan' has VLAN filtering enabled but no bridge VLANs configured" - Severity: low - Explanation: VLAN filtering without bridge-vlan entries can result in traffic drop. - Suggested fix: /interface bridge vlan add bridge=br-lan tagged=... untagged=... - Finding: "Multiple access ports assigned same PVID on same physical interface" - Severity: high - Explanation: Conflicting PVIDs can cause VLAN leakage. - Suggested fix: Review the VLAN assignments and correct PVIDs; provide example `interface bridge port` and `bridge vlan` commands. Ops & Safety - Any auto-generated remediation commands should be marked as recommendations. - When suggesting changes that impact traffic, indicate required maintenance window and estimated disruption. Next Steps - Add a backend analyzer module that accepts the configuration (structured context) and returns findings. - Add a small UI panel on `Mikrotik` page to invoke analysis and display results (category-filtered list with copy buttons). - Instrument telemetry endpoints (optional) for performance analysis. Authorship: Generated integration plan by the developer team.