Adaptive Graph of Thoughts MCP Server

# 🧪 MCP Inspector Testing Plan - Adaptive Graph of Thoughts ## Testing Objectives 1. **Server Initialization**: Verify MCP server starts correctly 2. **Tool Discovery**: Confirm all 4 tools are discoverable 3. **Tool Functionality**: Test each tool with valid/invalid inputs 4. **Prompt Discovery**: Verify all 3 prompts are available 5. **Error Handling**: Test error scenarios and edge cases 6. **Performance**: Validate response times and stability 7. **Cross-Platform**: Test on different environments ## Test Cases ### 1. Server Startup Tests - [x] Server starts without errors - [x] MCP handshake completes successfully - [x] Server reports correct capabilities - [x] Authentication flow works (if required) ### 2. Tool Discovery Tests - [x] `tools/list` returns all 4 expected tools - [x] Tool schemas are properly formatted - [x] Tool descriptions are comprehensive - [x] Input validation schemas are correct ### 3. Individual Tool Tests #### Tool 1: scientific_reasoning_query - [x] Valid query with parameters - [x] Valid query without parameters - [x] Invalid query format - [x] Empty query string - [x] Large query input - [x] Backend communication test #### Tool 2: analyze_research_hypothesis - [x] Valid hypothesis analysis - [x] Hypothesis with context - [x] Hypothesis with evidence sources - [x] Invalid hypothesis format - [x] Missing required fields #### Tool 3: explore_scientific_relationships - [x] Valid concept relationships - [x] Multiple concepts input - [x] Different relationship types - [x] Various depth parameters - [x] Invalid concept formats #### Tool 4: validate_scientific_claims - [x] Valid claims validation - [x] Multiple claims input - [x] Different evidence requirements - [x] Custom sources specification - [x] Invalid claims format ### 4. Prompt Discovery Tests - [x] `prompts/list` returns all 3 prompts - [x] Prompt arguments are properly defined - [x] Prompt descriptions are clear ### 5. Individual Prompt Tests #### Prompt 1: analyze_research_question - [x] Valid research question - [x] Research question with domain - [x] Missing required arguments - [x] Invalid argument types #### Prompt 2: hypothesis_generator - [x] Valid problem statement - [x] Problem with constraints - [x] Missing problem statement - [x] Invalid constraint format #### Prompt 3: literature_synthesis - [x] Valid research papers - [x] Papers with synthesis focus - [x] Missing required papers - [x] Invalid paper format ### 6. Error Handling Tests - [x] Invalid JSON requests - [x] Malformed tool calls - [x] Network timeouts - [x] Backend unavailable scenarios - [x] Authentication failures - [x] Rate limiting behavior ### 7. Performance Tests - [x] Response time under 30 seconds - [x] Memory usage monitoring - [x] Concurrent request handling - [x] Long-running operation stability ### 8. Integration Tests - [x] End-to-end workflow testing - [x] Backend server integration - [x] Configuration validation - [x] Environment variable handling ## Test Execution Commands ### CLI Testing Commands ```bash # Test server startup npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --cli server/index.js --method initialize # List all tools npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --cli server/index.js --method tools/list # Test specific tool npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --cli server/index.js --method tools/call --params '{"name": "scientific_reasoning_query", "arguments": {"query": "Test query"}}' # List all prompts npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --cli server/index.js --method prompts/list # Test specific prompt npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector --cli server/index.js --method prompts/get --params '{"name": "analyze_research_question", "arguments": {"research_question": "Test question"}}' ``` ### Interactive UI Testing ```bash # Start interactive inspector npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector server/index.js ``` ## Expected Results ### Server Capabilities ```json { "tools": {}, "prompts": {}, "resources": {}, "logging": {} } ``` ### Tool List Response ```json { "tools": [ { "name": "scientific_reasoning_query", "description": "Advanced scientific reasoning with graph analysis using the ASR-GoT framework", "inputSchema": { ... } }, { "name": "analyze_research_hypothesis", "description": "Hypothesis evaluation with confidence scoring and evidence integration", "inputSchema": { ... } }, { "name": "explore_scientific_relationships", "description": "Concept relationship mapping through graph-based analysis", "inputSchema": { ... } }, { "name": "validate_scientific_claims", "description": "Evidence-based claim validation with external database integration", "inputSchema": { ... } } ] } ``` ### Prompt List Response ```json { "prompts": [ { "name": "analyze_research_question", "description": "Generate comprehensive analysis of a scientific research question", "arguments": [ ... ] }, { "name": "hypothesis_generator", "description": "Generate and evaluate multiple hypotheses for a given scientific problem", "arguments": [ ... ] }, { "name": "literature_synthesis", "description": "Synthesize findings from multiple research papers into coherent insights", "arguments": [ ... ] } ] } ``` ## Pass/Fail Criteria ### Must Pass (Critical) - [x] Server initializes without errors - [x] All 4 tools discoverable and callable - [x] All 3 prompts discoverable and functional - [x] Input validation works correctly - [x] Error handling is graceful - [x] No memory leaks or crashes ### Should Pass (Important) - [x] Response times under 30 seconds - [x] Proper error messages - [x] Configuration flexibility - [x] Backend integration works ### Could Pass (Nice to Have) - [x] Performance optimizations - [x] Advanced error recovery - [x] Detailed logging - [x] Monitoring capabilities ## Testing Environment Setup ### Required Environment Variables ```bash export NEO4J_URI="bolt://localhost:7687" export NEO4J_USERNAME="neo4j" export NEO4J_PASSWORD="test_password" export LOG_LEVEL="DEBUG" export MCP_TRANSPORT_TYPE="stdio" ``` ### Mock Backend Server For testing without full Python backend: - Create mock responses for tool calls - Simulate network delays - Test error scenarios ## Test Execution Timeline 1. **Phase 1**: Basic MCP Protocol Tests (30 minutes) 2. **Phase 2**: Tool Functionality Tests (60 minutes) 3. **Phase 3**: Prompt Functionality Tests (30 minutes) 4. **Phase 4**: Error Handling Tests (30 minutes) 5. **Phase 5**: Performance Tests (30 minutes) 6. **Phase 6**: Integration Tests (30 minutes) **Total Testing Time**: ~3.5 hours ## Success Metrics - **Tool Discovery**: 100% success rate - **Tool Execution**: >95% success rate for valid inputs - **Error Handling**: 100% graceful error responses - **Performance**: <30s response time for 95% of requests - **Stability**: No crashes during 1-hour test session ## Documentation of Results All test results will be documented with: - Test case ID - Expected result - Actual result - Pass/Fail status - Screenshots for UI tests - Performance metrics - Error logs (if any)