Codebase MCP Server

# Specification Quality Checklist: Performance Validation & Multi-Tenant Testing **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning **Created**: 2025-10-13 **Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md) ## Content Quality - [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) - [x] Focused on user value and business needs - [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders - [x] All mandatory sections completed ## Requirement Completeness - [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain (all 3 clarifications resolved) - [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous - [x] Success criteria are measurable - [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) - [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined - [x] Edge cases are identified - [x] Scope is clearly bounded - [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified ## Feature Readiness - [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria - [x] User scenarios cover primary flows - [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria - [x] No implementation details leak into specification ## Clarifications Resolved All 3 clarification markers have been resolved with user input: 1. **Q1 - Load Testing Latency Threshold**: Accept degradation to <2000ms p95 under 50-client load (prioritizes availability over performance under extreme stress) 2. **Q2 - Load Test Duration**: 1-hour continuous stress test (catches immediate issues, suitable for CI/CD, achievable within 4-6 hour phase estimate) 3. **Q3 - Baseline Update Procedure**: Hybrid approach - flag regression only if metrics exceed BOTH 10% degradation from baseline AND constitutional targets (allows minor degradation within targets, rejects significant regression) ## Validation Status **Overall**: ✅ Specification is COMPLETE and READY FOR PLANNING **Next Step**: Proceed to `/speckit.plan` to generate implementation plan ## Notes - Specification follows template structure with all mandatory sections - User scenarios are properly prioritized (P1-P3) and independently testable - 20 functional requirements with clear acceptance criteria - 14 measurable success criteria, all technology-agnostic - 10 edge cases identified with specific scenarios - 7 assumptions documented - 8 out-of-scope items clearly stated - Success criteria use specific metrics (time, percentages, counts) - No implementation leakage detected