Skip to main content
Glama
99blakeD99

Metis FCA Handbook AI Harness MCP Server

by 99blakeD99
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Metis FCA Handbook AI Harness MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RegGuard MCP Server

      Elnino0009
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An AI-powered compliance assistant that analyzes financial marketing content for regulatory violations across multiple jurisdictions including Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE, and India. It enables real-time compliance checking, automatic disclaimer insertion, and audit trail generation within MCP-compatible environments like Claude and Cursor.
      3
      MIT

    • eu-regulations

      Ansvar-Systems
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Query 37 EU regulations — from GDPR and AI Act to DORA, MiFID II, eIDAS, Medical Device Regulation, and more — directly from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client.
      14
      112 npm
      25
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion with other tools. Its purpose is clearly defined for evaluating FCA handbook applicability.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('evaluate_fca_handbook_applicability'). With only one tool, there are no naming inconsistencies to penalize.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server exposes only one tool, which feels thin for a compliance-focused service. While the tool is substantial, a single tool offers minimal surface area and would benefit from auxiliary operations like retrieving past evaluations.

    Completeness4/5

    The sole tool thoroughly covers the advertised purpose of evaluating FCA handbook applicability, including detailed input guidance and refinement suggestions. However, it lacks any supporting operations such as listing or retrieving historical evaluations, leaving minor gaps for multi-step workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources