Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to docctx

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server that turns project documentation and source code into durable, evidence-backed context for AI agents, with bounded retrieval and explicit gap reporting.
      8
      318 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first codebase intelligence engine providing AI coding agents with a typed MCP toolset for understanding and navigating code repositories.
      100
      51
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first document retrieval engine that mounts as an MCP tool for agents to index files, search for relevant passages, and let the agent's own LLM answer.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to retrieve token-budgeted project context, search code symbols, look up definitions, and access project memory and cross-project learnings through local MCP tools. It reduces redundant exploration by supplying the smallest useful context from a deterministic, local-first index.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: list_packs discovers available packs, search_docs finds relevant chunks, and get_chunk retrieves a specific chunk by ID. There is no functional overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_packs, search_docs, get_chunk. The naming is predictable and makes the action and target of each tool immediately clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is a well-scoped size for a read-only documentation retrieval server. Each tool fills a necessary step in the discovery-search-retrieval workflow without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow of listing packs, searching chunks, and retrieving full chunk content is well covered. A minor gap is that there is no direct way to enumerate all chunks within a pack, but this can be worked around via search for most retrieval needs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues