xtalk_leave

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action without explaining side effects (e.g., whether leaving disconnects, whether it's idempotent, if it requires any state). The minimal description fails to provide sufficient behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) but lacks important details. It is concise but at the expense of completeness, making it average.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and low complexity (1 param), the description should clarify what 'leave' entails. It fails to explain any contextual details, such as whether the room must be active or what happens after leaving. Additionally, the sibling 'xtalk_room_leave' introduces potential confusion.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter description ('Room id; defaults to active room'), so the description adds no new value. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'leave' and the resource 'room', and specifies 'active or selected', which distinguishes it from room creation or joining tools. However, the sibling 'xtalk_room_leave' suggests possible duplication or confusion, but the description itself is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies a simple use case (leave a room) but provides no guidance on when to use vs. not use, no prerequisites (e.g., must be in a room), and no mention of alternative tools like xtalk_room_leave.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.