set_breakpoint_by_script_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It indicates a mutation (setting a breakpoint) but does not disclose side effects, error conditions, or return behavior. This minimal information barely meets the threshold for transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, very concise with no redundant words. However, it may be too brief, omitting valuable context that could aid the AI agent without significant added length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, 2 required, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain the purpose of the 'condition' parameter, success/failure behavior, or provide any example usage. The tool's complexity demands a richer description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description associates script_id with CDP scriptId and line_number with zero-based line/column, but does not explain the 'condition' or 'column_number' parameters. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate but fails to add meaningful semantic detail for all parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Set a breakpoint) and the resource (breakpoint), specifying the unique identifiers used (CDP scriptId and zero-based line/column). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like set_breakpoint_by_url and set_breakpoint_on_text which use different identification methods.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as set_breakpoint_by_url or set_breakpoint_on_text. It does not mention any prerequisites or conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.