mcp-server-asana
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-asana
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive Asana integration, enabling AI assistants like Claude to interact with Asana workspaces, projects, tasks, goals, portfolios, and more.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP (Multi-Agent Conversation Protocol) server that enables interacting with the Asana API through natural language commands for task management, project organization, and team collaboration.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP (Multi-Agent Conversation Protocol) Server that enables interaction with the Asana API, auto-generated using AG2's MCP builder.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for Asana that accesses every workspace using a personal access token, enabling task and project management through integrated tools like list, create, and complete tasks.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Type 4 OAuth MCP server for the Asana API, enabling AI assistants to manage workspaces, projects, tasks, comments, users, and teams.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants full access to the Motion task and project management API, enabling task, project, and schedule management.-
TDQS
Scored across 33 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource+action, but there are a few confusable pairs: asana_add_task_dependencies vs asana_add_task_dependents, and the singular/plural asana_get_project_status vs asana_get_project_statuses. asana_set_parent_for_task and asana_create_subtask also overlap conceptually around parent/subtask relationships, though descriptions help distinguish them.
Every tool follows a consistent asana_verb_noun pattern (e.g. asana_get_task, asana_create_tag_for_workspace, asana_add_tag_to_task). Prefix, verb style, and snake_case are uniform throughout, making the surface highly predictable.
33 tools is on the heavy end, exceeding the comfortable 3-15 range and bordering on the 25+ 'too many' threshold. Asana is a broad domain that justifies much of this breadth, but some consolidation (e.g. tags/stories) would reduce surface area.
Strong lifecycle coverage: task CRUD plus stories, subtasks, dependencies, project associations, tags, and project statuses. Minor gaps exist (no update_project, no delete_project, no update_project_status), but core workflows are well supported.