ZIP-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to ZIP-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA powerful ZIP file processing tool that enables creating, extracting, listing, adding, deleting, viewing, and verifying ZIP files through MCP protocol integration with AI development environments.13 npmMIT

micompress-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents compress images, PDFs, video, audio, documents, and archives, writing the smaller versions back to disk via the MiCompress service.2 npmMIT- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceProvides tools for AI assistants to compress, decompress, and manage ZIP archives including metadata retrieval. It supports directory compression, password protection, and configurable extraction options.410 npmISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform 13 PDF operations (merge, split, compress, watermark, encrypt, and more) on local files via MCP.2-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that provides over 50 file and system management tools for AI models, including navigation, file operations, search, compression, and system information capabilities.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local, zero-cloud MCP server for token and text compression. It provides tools to compress, auto-compress, measure, and decompress text using offline rules, lossless gzip packing, or a local Ollama semantic model.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Three tools (compress, decompress, getZipInfo) are clearly distinct and cover core ZIP operations, but the 'echo' tool is unrelated to the ZIP domain and could cause confusion as it serves a generic testing purpose rather than a ZIP-specific function.
The naming is mixed: 'compress' and 'decompress' use consistent verb-based names, but 'getZipInfo' uses a verb_noun pattern with camelCase, and 'echo' is a standalone verb. This creates a readable but inconsistent convention across the tool set.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a ZIP utility server, though slightly thin for comprehensive coverage. The inclusion of 'echo' reduces the effective domain-specific tools to 3, which is borderline but still functional for basic operations.
The tool set covers basic ZIP operations (compress, decompress, get metadata), but lacks advanced features like listing contents without extraction, adding/removing files from archives, or handling password-protected ZIPs. The 'echo' tool does not contribute to ZIP functionality, creating a minor gap in domain coverage.