Skip to main content
Glama
7gugu
by 7gugu

Related Servers

Alternatives to ZIP-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful ZIP file processing tool that enables creating, extracting, listing, adding, deleting, viewing, and verifying ZIP files through MCP protocol integration with AI development environments.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI agents compress images, PDFs, video, audio, documents, and archives, writing the smaller versions back to disk via the MiCompress service.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides tools for AI assistants to compress, decompress, and manage ZIP archives including metadata retrieval. It supports directory compression, password protection, and configurable extraction options.
      4
      10 npm
      ISC
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform 13 PDF operations (merge, split, compress, watermark, encrypt, and more) on local files via MCP.
      2
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that provides over 50 file and system management tools for AI models, including navigation, file operations, search, compression, and system information capabilities.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local, zero-cloud MCP server for token and text compression. It provides tools to compress, auto-compress, measure, and decompress text using offline rules, lossless gzip packing, or a local Ollama semantic model.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Three tools (compress, decompress, getZipInfo) are clearly distinct and cover core ZIP operations, but the 'echo' tool is unrelated to the ZIP domain and could cause confusion as it serves a generic testing purpose rather than a ZIP-specific function.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: 'compress' and 'decompress' use consistent verb-based names, but 'getZipInfo' uses a verb_noun pattern with camelCase, and 'echo' is a standalone verb. This creates a readable but inconsistent convention across the tool set.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a ZIP utility server, though slightly thin for comprehensive coverage. The inclusion of 'echo' reduces the effective domain-specific tools to 3, which is borderline but still functional for basic operations.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers basic ZIP operations (compress, decompress, get metadata), but lacks advanced features like listing contents without extraction, adding/removing files from archives, or handling password-protected ZIPs. The 'echo' tool does not contribute to ZIP functionality, creating a minor gap in domain coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessResponsive