Skip to main content
Glama
73882

feature-separate-batch-eval-mcp

by 73882
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to feature-separate-batch-eval-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • patent-agent

      iStoryOfSpring
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables conversational patent data analysis through a set of tools for trend analysis, clustering, word cloud generation, and more. Allows natural language queries to explore patent datasets with structured results and visualizations.
      1
      AGPL 3.0

    • gameops

      nickname21kmr
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-first game operations incident investigation through read-only MCP tools, including metric queries, cohort comparisons, anomaly detection, and reproducible incident report drafting with citations.
      76
      MIT

    • agent-eval

      mrd5591
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables analyzing coding-agent session transcripts to measure tool efficiency, detect loops, track test outcomes, and report costs, with MCP tools for listing sessions, analyzing sessions, finding loops, and generating cost reports.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: status (list cohorts), tag (assign records), check (validate one cohort), run (execute network eval), insights (list persisted results). Status and check both touch 'readiness' and status/insights both list things, which introduces mild overlap, but descriptions keep them separable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Every tool shares the consistent 'feature_separate_batch_eval_' prefix followed by a short suffix, forming a predictable pattern. Minor deviation in that tag/check/run are verbs while status/insights are nouns, but overall highly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    Five tools is a reasonable, well-scoped set for a batch-evaluation workflow (readiness, tagging, validation, execution, insights). Slightly lean but each tool has a clear role without redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The core lifecycle (list readiness, assign cohorts, validate, run, retrieve insights) is covered, but there is no way to modify/remove cohort assignments or clear/export persisted insights, leaving some dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources