vibekit_redeploy
Redeploy a hosted app to its latest code version by providing the app ID.
Instructions
Redeploy an existing hosted app to update it with latest code.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| appId | Yes | The app ID to redeploy |
Redeploy a hosted app to its latest code version by providing the app ID.
Redeploy an existing hosted app to update it with latest code.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| appId | Yes | The app ID to redeploy |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits like what happens to the running app, potential downtime, or whether the operation is reversible.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is concise and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite the tool's simplicity, the description lacks completeness: no return value specification, no confirmation behavior, and insufficient context among sibling tools (e.g., when to use redeploy vs deploy).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a basic description for appId. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (redeploy) and resource (existing hosted app), distinguishing it from sibling tools like vibekit_deploy (initial deploy) and vibekit_create_app (creation).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives, such as vibekit_deploy or vibekit_set_env. It lacks prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/609NFT/vibekit-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server