Skip to main content
Glama
5uper0

parley-mcp

by 5uper0
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to parley-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agent-gate

      Jott2121
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces fail-closed deterministic checks, independent refute-first review, and tamper-evident hash-chained receipts for AI agent outputs before claiming completion.
      4
      3
      MIT

    • LedgerProof LAIN

      vsdawkins-creator
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Cryptographically anchored, tamper-evident evidence receipts for AI agents — verified run receipts, existence-at-time proofs, and cited answers from an anchored public record. Remote MCP with proof-gated settlement; attests existence and integrity, never truth.
      -
    • genpark-multi-agent-debate-consensus-synthesizer-skill by alphaparkinc

      genpark-multi-agent-debateofficial

      alphaparkinc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run structured multi-persona debates over high-stakes decisions and merge their positions into an explainable consensus, complete with logged dissenting minority opinions. It runs as a zero-dependency Python MCP server or importable module, compatible with Claude Desktop, Cursor, and custom agent frameworks.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools have distinct targets: parley_decide produces a decision, parley_verify_receipt re-checks the full transcript/hash and max-min, and parley_check_party replays one party's red lines. There is mild overlap between the two verification tools, but the descriptions clearly delineate what each checks.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three names follow a single, predictable pattern: parley_ prefix plus a consistent verb_noun form (decide, verify_receipt, check_party). No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the thin side, but the domain is a narrow, self-contained decision engine, and decide/verify/check each earns a clear place. It is a touch under-provisioned rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: reach a decision, verify the recorded transcript, and re-check a single party. Privacy-mode execution is delegated to examples/run_env.py rather than a tool, and there is no batch check, but nothing leaves an obvious dead end for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources