Skip to main content
Glama
5nail000

fusion-cad-ai

by 5nail000

Related Servers

Alternatives to fusion-cad-ai

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible assistants to control Autodesk Fusion for mechanical modeling, assembly editing, CAM workflows, inspection, and model export through Fusion's native MCP endpoint.
      39
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect and automate Autodesk Fusion 360 through MCP, providing tools for CAD modeling, CAM manufacturing, and document management.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to create and manipulate 3D CAD models using natural language via MCP, with git-based versioning and manufacturing output generation.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD automation, enabling natural language control over sketching, 3D modeling, and CAM operations. It uses a Python-based bridge and a custom add-in to execute over 80 tools ranging from simple geometry creation to complex assembly and parameter management.
      80
      329 PyPI
      108
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to build, measure, verify, and correct parametric SolidWorks parts and assemblies locally via the COM API, supporting operations like sketching, extruding, modeling, dimensioning, material assignment, export, and assembly mating.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct CAD operations, but several clusters overlap: execute/execute_file/script for code execution and logging, validate/locate_defects/inspect_part/compare/design_audit for validation and comparison, and last_error/repair_hints for diagnostics. Descriptions help, but an agent could still misselect among these related tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The set is mostly lower snake_case, but ordering is inconsistent: some are verb_noun (save_snapshot, locate_defects), some noun_verb (params_get, params_set, assembly_add_part, joint_create, motion_sweep), and others are bare nouns (script, session_state, job_status). It remains readable but lacks a predictable convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 33 tools, the surface is heavy for a single MCP server and likely exceeds what an agent can hold coherently. Several validation, diagnostics, and execution tools could be consolidated or grouped to reduce selection burden.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a broad CAD lifecycle: document creation, execution, parameters, snapshots, measurement, validation, import/export, rendering, assembly, joints, motion, and printability. Minor gaps exist, such as delete/remove operations for bodies, components, or joints, and listing existing documents or snapshots.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues