Skip to main content
Glama
fusion-cad-ai

fusion-cad-ai

by 5nail000

Related Servers

Alternatives to fusion-cad-ai

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to build and modify parametric 3D models in Autodesk Fusion 360 through sketches, solid features, construction geometry, inspection tools, and in-Fusion Python execution. It connects MCP clients to a local Fusion add-in with status checks, error reporting, and unit-aware operations.
      154
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables controlling Autodesk Fusion 360 from any MCP-compatible AI client through natural language. Exposes tools for creating sketches, drawing rectangles and circles, extruding, revolving, filleting, shelling, drilling holes and bolt-circle patterns, managing user parameters, and exporting STEP/STL files, plus batch generation of parametric variants.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to build and edit native CAD parts and assemblies, inspect saved geometry and measurements, retain revisions, run mechanism and interference checks, and export STEP/STL/GLB artifacts through MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible assistants to control Autodesk Fusion for mechanical modeling, assembly editing, CAM workflows, inspection, and model export through Fusion's native MCP endpoint.
      39
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to inspect and automate Autodesk Fusion 360 through MCP, providing tools for CAD modeling, CAM manufacturing, and document management.
      -

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct CAD operations, but several clusters overlap: execute/execute_file/script for code execution and logging, validate/locate_defects/inspect_part/compare/design_audit for validation and comparison, and last_error/repair_hints for diagnostics. Descriptions help, but an agent could still misselect among these related tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The set is mostly lower snake_case, but ordering is inconsistent: some are verb_noun (save_snapshot, locate_defects), some noun_verb (params_get, params_set, assembly_add_part, joint_create, motion_sweep), and others are bare nouns (script, session_state, job_status). It remains readable but lacks a predictable convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 33 tools, the surface is heavy for a single MCP server and likely exceeds what an agent can hold coherently. Several validation, diagnostics, and execution tools could be consolidated or grouped to reduce selection burden.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a broad CAD lifecycle: document creation, execution, parameters, snapshots, measurement, validation, import/export, rendering, assembly, joints, motion, and printability. Minor gaps exist, such as delete/remove operations for bodies, components, or joints, and listing existing documents or snapshots.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues