Skip to main content
Glama
5iNeX

yandex-api-mcp

by 5iNeX

Related Servers

Alternatives to yandex-api-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables safe, informed management of Yandex.Direct accounts through 11 MCP tools, covering reads, planned two-phase writes, reports, media attachment, Wordstat, Metrika, and Audience operations, while exposing platform knowledge as resources such as limits, traps, and the red line of deliberately absent destructive actions.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server for Yandex Webmaster that exposes tools for SEO operations including search query analytics, sitemap management, indexing history, recrawl quota, and diagnostics.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server lets you query Yandex Webmaster data in plain language, covering search queries, indexing, diagnostics, sitemaps, backlinks, and recrawl status. It is read-only by default (except recrawl submission) and uses OAuth without storing secrets.
      10
      44 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Yandex Webmaster API, enabling natural-language queries about site indexing, search queries, IKS, diagnostics, sitemaps, and external links, as well as actions like recrawling, from AI assistants such as Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
      20
      99 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Yandex advertising and analytics APIs (Direct, Metrika, Audience, Webmaster, AdMetrica) through MCP tools, resources, and prompts for campaign management and data retrieval.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 140 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    Massive overlap: direct.list_campaigns vs direct.hf.find_campaigns vs direct.hf.get_campaign_summary, multiple report tools for the same data, raw vs hf variants for nearly every operation. An agent cannot reliably select the right tool without deep domain knowledge.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use dot-separated snake_case, but action placement is inconsistent (direct.list_campaigns vs metrica.goals.list) and some tools lack a namespace (search_serp). The hf prefix adds another layer but is not universally applied.

    Tool Count1/5

    140 tools is an extreme mismatch far beyond the typical 3–15 range. Many tools are thin wrappers or duplicate functionality, creating prohibitive cognitive load for an agent.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface is very broad, covering Direct, Metrica, Audience, Wordstat, and Search with CRUD for many resources, raw escape hatches, and cross-domain joins. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no delete for campaigns/adgroups/ads, limited Audience pixel management, Search API only web).

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues