Skip to main content
Glama
5hihan

CodeAtlas

by 5hihan
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to CodeAtlas

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Precision-MCP

      rohitkhamrai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to index a workspace into AST symbol graphs and retrieve exact function or class slices, trace callers and blast radius, and apply syntax-safe symbol patches without dumping whole files into context.
      7
      1
      MIT

    • codegraph-mcp

      shekharnair96
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes a codebase's symbol graph and symbol-aware editing tools to AI agents, enabling targeted symbol lookup, impact analysis, and atomic multi-file edits with reduced context tokens.
      6 npm
      MIT

    • Engram

      cholland00
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to query a local structural code graph, inspect code relationships and recorded mistakes, and retrieve focused project context before reading entire files.
      24 npm
      MIT

    • engram-serve

      NiklasMoreno405
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to pull focused, token-bounded context from a local structural code graph stored in SQLite, so they can locate relevant code, traverse relationships between entities, and carry recorded mistakes into later sessions instead of reading whole files. It also supports serving that context over an authenticated local HTTP dashboard.
      24 npm
      MIT

    • codebase-rag

      Ar-maan05
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to efficiently understand and navigate a codebase by providing semantic search over symbols and a reference graph, replacing expensive grep/glob calls with structured tools like definition lookup, caller/callee queries, and change-impact analysis.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 38 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools generally have distinct purposes, with clear guidance for high-level entry points (repo_overview, repo_map, task_context, change_context) and separate refactoring/snipe workflows. However, several retrieval tools overlap in scope (symbol vs find_symbols vs symbol_source, relationships vs dependencies vs module_graph), so an agent may still need to study descriptions carefully.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are all snake_case, but conventions are mixed: many are bare nouns (symbol, references, impact, findings) while others use verb_noun (find_symbols, replace_symbol, verify_snipe), and one uses get_ (get_snipe_context). The pattern is readable but not consistently predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    38 tools is far above the ideal 3–15 range and qualifies as too many for a single MCP server. While the domain is complex, many snipe and context tools could be consolidated or hidden behind higher-level operations.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: indexing, repo/symbol exploration, dependency analysis, refactoring, grep, static findings, and a full issue-triage/verification workflow. Minor gaps remain (e.g., no explicit symbol deletion/move or multi-symbol refactor), but agents can work around them with replace_symbol/insert_code.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources