vikunja-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to vikunja-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Vikunja task management instances through natural language. Supports comprehensive project and task operations including CRUD, assignments, labels, comments, relations, and attachments.3316 npm2MIT
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Vikunja task management instances, providing full task, project, label, team, user, and webhook management operations through subcommand-based tools.16146 npm109MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Vikunja task management via ergonomic and raw REST tools for projects, tasks, labels, and comments.1005 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants like Claude to manage Vikunja tasks – view, add, complete, edit, and delete tasks through natural language commands via Vikunja's REST API.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables to interact with Vikunja task management through its REST API, supporting projects, tasks, comments, labels, assignees, and relations with field preservation.16 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects Claude to self-hosted Vikunja instances for conversational task and project management. Supports CRUD operations on projects and tasks, plus labels, comments, weekly reviews, calendar feeds, and task relations.16 npm-
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
The 'vikunja_tasks' tool description claims to handle all task operations, overlapping with many specialized tools like vikunja_task_crud, vikunja_task_assignees, vikunja_task_comments, etc. This creates significant ambiguity about which tool to use for task-related actions, leading to potential misselection.
All tools share the 'vikunja_' prefix, but the suffix naming is inconsistent: some use plain nouns (auth, filters, projects), while tasks have a mix of 'vikunja_tasks' and 'vikunja_task_*'. The plural 'tasks' vs singular 'task' adds inconsistency, though overall the pattern is still readable.
With 17 tools, the count is slightly above the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. The duplication due to the overlapping 'vikunja_tasks' tool makes the set feel heavier than necessary, but for a full-featured task management server, 17 tools could be justified if each had a distinct role.
The tool surface covers authentication, projects, tasks (with comments, labels, relations, reminders, bulk operations), teams, templates, webhooks, and filters. It addresses most lifecycle operations for the domain, though the redundancy suggests some consolidation could be possible.