Skip to main content
Glama
4hglee-ops

Gyuniverse GitHub Projects MCP

by 4hglee-ops

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gyuniverse GitHub Projects MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and project managers to turn GitHub Projects v2 into an autonomous project-management layer, handling task checkout, atomic claims, heartbeats, reviews, token budgets, and AI-powered PRD, sprint, triage, and roadmap workflows. It also provides GitHub Actions, Releases, Branches, MCP Resources, and MCP Prompts support with GitHub-native storage.
      95 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to read a project's Git-backed kickoff, acceptance criteria, handoff package, progress, and next step, and to append validated, audited progress events as project records. It provides short-lived scoped credentials and fail-closed tool allowlisting for safe, resumable AI-assisted development.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and teams to turn GitHub Projects v2 into an autonomous task substrate for registering, claiming, tracking, reviewing, and completing work, while also supporting AI-powered PRD generation, sprint planning, issue triage, roadmap creation, GitHub Actions/releases/branches, and MCP resources/prompts.
      95 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A security-first MCP gateway that enables AI assistants to safely inspect and interact with GitHub repositories through a controlled, auditable tool layer with policy enforcement and human approval for mutations.
      27
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A policy-aware MCP server for GitHub and GitHub Actions that enables safe AI-assisted infrastructure workflows—inspecting repositories, preparing branches and pull requests, and constrained remote mutations behind explicit preview-bound approval tokens.
      18
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools overlap heavily, especially compatibility aliases (update_github_project_item_status vs update_work_item_status, and similarly for priority) and multiple project-state readers (get_github_project_snapshot, get_github_project_brief_context, get_project_brief, get_project_changes). An agent could easily misselect among resolution, snapshot, and brief tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the surface mixes prefixed (github_project) and unprefixed (work_item, project_brief) conventions, and includes explicit alias pairs. This remains readable but not fully predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    40 tools is heavy for a GitHub Projects MCP, with bulk operations, audit logging, and multiple analysis layers. Each earns some place, but the count is well above a well-scoped 10–15 tool surface.

    Completeness3/5

    Core read, write, relationship, bulk, and analysis coverage is strong, but notable lifecycle gaps remain: no remove/delete Project item, no Project or field creation/mutation beyond item fields, and no draft issue creation. Agents can cover many workflows but will hit dead ends for cleanup and schema changes.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive