codex-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to codex-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal MCP bridge that lets Codex operate local Claude Code sessions, including listing, starting, resuming, forking, prompting, and stopping conversations via the Remote Control CLI.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceBridges OpenAI Codex CLI to any MCP client, allowing headless Codex sessions via tools like codex and codex-reply.217 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible coding agents to execute the local Codex CLI as a coding agent, including code reviews, session resume/fork, and CLI diagnostics.96 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local MCP bridge that lets ChatGPT chat mode operate the user's own computer, running project, file, and shell tasks through a local executor and returning progress and results to the conversation. It also coordinates Codex sessions (persistent or one-off) and other agent CLIs as sub-agents.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients and external AI supervisors to oversee and steer native Codex sessions through a thin local stdio bridge. It exposes eleven codex_* supervisory tools for tasks such as listing threads, starting turns, observing progress, steering, responding to approvals, interrupting, checkpointing, and rolling over work.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA personal MCP bridge that lets ChatGPT drive a local Codex CLI, translating instructions into Codex app-server threads and returning compact summaries of what Codex did.13MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Several tools have overlapping purposes, such as codex_continue, codex_continue_thread, and codex_run_turn all appearing to continue a thread. Aliases like codex_continue and codex_interrupt add confusion, making it hard for an agent to select the correct tool.
The snake_case and 'codex_' prefix are consistent, but the presence of aliases (e.g., codex_continue vs. codex_continue_thread) and inconsistent verb usage (run, continue, fork, archive) reduces clarity.
13 tools is a reasonable number for managing Codex threads, covering creation, continuation, interruption, archiving, and listing. It is well-scoped without being excessive.
The tool set covers essential thread operations: start, continue, fork, archive, unarchive, list, and get. Missing update/delete capabilities are minor given the conversational domain, and most workflows are supported.