@4da/mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to @4da/mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceDependency security & health auditing for AI agents with no account or API key required.22MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceVulnerability intelligence for AI agents that enables CVE lookup, package vulnerability checks, and dependency auditing without API keys.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceOpen source intelligence for AI agents — GitHub project-health scoring, package dependency-risk analysis, trending repositories, license checks, and side-by-side package comparison.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenancePackage intelligence for AI coding agents that checks npm and PyPI package health, deprecation, vulnerabilities, bundle size, and compares alternatives.5-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAI-powered dependency vulnerability and breaking change analyzer that scans dependencies, identifies vulnerabilities via OSV.dev, and uses AI to assess real impact and suggest fixes.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides crowdsourced package intelligence and security alerts for AI coding assistants by analyzing project dependencies and framework co-occurrence. It enables automated project scans, package alternative discovery, and data-driven recommendations across multiple programming ecosystems.108 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Some tools are clearly distinct (vulnerability_scan vs dependency_health vs upgrade_planner), but get_context, what_should_i_know, and agent_memory all deal with context/memory and could cause misselection. check_decision_alignment overlaps with decision_memory's 'check' functionality.
Tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern, mixing noun_verb and verb_noun forms (vulnerability_scan, dependency_health, upgrade_planner) with a few verb-first names (get_context, check_decision_alignment). The style is consistent, but verb placement varies slightly.
9 tools is appropriate for a developer-assistant server covering security, dependency, and memory features. Each tool seems purposeful and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range.
The security/dependency workflow is well covered (scan, health, plan), and memory tools cover both recording and recalling. Missing actions like clearing memory or comparing dependency versions are minor gaps that agents could work around.