Skip to main content
Glama
335234131

agent-browser-mcp

by 335234131
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-browser-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • chrome-agent-browser

      oscs1024-pixel
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to directly operate a user's local Chrome browser with full login state and cookies, supporting 23 tools such as tab management, clicking, typing, screenshots, file upload, and network inspection through natural language.
      257 npm
      MIT

    • agentic-browser

      davarion-tech
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control your installed Google Chrome through MCP or HTTP using compact text snapshots, exact pixel coordinates, and a visible cursor. It provides browser tools for navigation, clicking, typing, scrolling, tabs, forms, waiting, recording, and human handoff.
      0
      2
      MIT

    • chrome-agent-mcp

      otaviosenne
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fully control Google Chrome: navigate, click, fill forms, inspect DevTools, and manage tabs with parallel execution and session isolation.
      24
      7 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but some overlap exists: 'capture_desktop_screenshot' and 'capture_page_screenshot' could be confused for similar screenshot tasks, and 'cdp_batch' and 'cdp_command' both handle CDP commands with subtle differences. The descriptions help clarify, but an agent might occasionally misselect between these pairs.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as 'capture_desktop_screenshot', 'list_tabs', and 'open_new_tab'. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and use the tools without confusion from mixed naming conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 20 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a browser automation server that covers desktop interaction, CDP commands, and page management. It feels comprehensive without being overly bloated, though it borders on the upper limit of typical scoping.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for browser automation, including navigation, tab management, input simulation, screenshot capture, CDP access, and diagnostics. There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform core workflows like opening URLs, interacting with pages, and debugging without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources