hent_tabell

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description transparently explains the tool's output (metadata, title, dimensions, codes/labels). It does not discuss error handling or rate limits, but for a simple read operation, this is acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact (two sentences), front-loaded with the main purpose, and free of extraneous information. Every sentence contributes value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only 2 parameters and no output schema, the description covers all necessary aspects: what it returns, how to use it with sibling tools, and the language independence of codes. It is self-contained for a simple metadata retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds a minor contextual note about language-independence of variable codes but does not significantly enhance the schema's parameter explanations.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves metadata for a StatFin table, listing specific elements (title, dimensions, value codes/labels). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by advising use before hent_data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use the tool (before hent_data) and provides guidance on variable codes being language-independent and how to pass them to hent_data.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.