brain-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to brain-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop, Cursor, Zed, and Windsurf to recall associative context from a folder of markdown notes, combining vector search entry points with one-hop [[wikilink]] graph expansion and cross-encoder reranking over a single SQLite file. It also appends a zero-token per-turn ledger of asks, files, tools, and decisions that agents can consult across sessions.242 PyPI12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to store, search, and retrieve long-term memory as plain Markdown files with a disposable SQLite index, including note management, decision/bug tracking, and codebase symbol lookup via MCP.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to create, link, search, explore, and synthesize atomic notes through Claude and other MCP-compatible clients, using Markdown files backed by a SQLite index.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGives coding agents a persistent memory by searching a local, read-only index of existing markdown and letting them write findings back as notes that the next session can retrieve. It serves ranked, context-sized results over MCP, injects standing conventions at session start, and keeps data on your machine with secret redaction and archive-only deletion.70 PyPIMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to create atomic notes, link them with semantic relationship types, tag and search them, and traverse the resulting knowledge graph for exploration and synthesis. Notes are stored as human-readable Markdown files that remain the source of truth, with a rebuildable SQLite index for fast querying.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to create, link, search, explore, and synthesize atomic notes through Claude and other MCP-compatible clients, using markdown files and a SQLite index.-
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct action on notes: browse (list), create (encode), relate (link), retire (supersede), re-check (validate), find (search), open (read). The only mild overlap is between brain_list and brain_search, both retrieval paths, but descriptions differentiate enumeration from query-based recall.
Every tool follows a uniform brain_<verb> pattern (brain_list, brain_encode, brain_link, brain_supersede, brain_validate, brain_search, brain_read). Fully predictable and consistent.
Seven tools is well-scoped for a note-memory system, covering browse/search/read/create/link/supersede/validate without redundancy. Each tool earns its place.
The lifecycle is well covered: create, retrieve, relate, retire, and confidence-update, with intentional design that history is never edited in place. Minor gap is no explicit cortex management or bulk cleanup, though cortex creation is folded into encode.