Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to doodle

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A shared whiteboard for you and your AI agent I wanted my AI agent and me to be able to point at the same thing. Any MCP-capable agent can read the canvas, draw on it, drop thought bubbles, animate elements, and react when you sketch something.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first whiteboard MCP server that enables AI agents to create, inspect, and update canvas diagrams and shapes collaboratively via 13 semantic tools.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to draw animated, hand-drawn diagrams on a live whiteboard through MCP tools, allowing users to visually explain concepts and edit scenes interactively.
      49 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables visual collaboration with an AI agent on a codebase through a shared drawing canvas, where hand-drawn diagrams are inferred as editable structure over MCP.
      12 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools have mostly distinct purposes: get_board reads canvas data, show_board opens an interactive view, draw_board writes/draws, and scan_project scans workspace files. get_board and show_board could be confused at first, but the descriptions explicitly separate reading data from displaying a canvas.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_board, show_board, draw_board, scan_project. The convention is predictable and easy to map to each tool's action.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a compact, well-scoped set for a shared canvas server. The only concern is that draw_board carries many responsibilities, including drawing and board-library management, which could justify splitting but does not make the overall count inappropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: reading board data, displaying the board, and drawing or modifying it. Minor gaps exist around explicit object deletion, undo, or clear operations, but draw_board's modification capabilities and library actions cover most practical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues