Bilibili Comments MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| BILIBILI_SESSDATA | Yes | Bilibili Cookie 中的 SESSDATA 值。获取方式：登录 Bilibili 网站，打开浏览器开发者工具 (F12)，在 Network (网络) 选项卡中刷新页面，找到任意一个 bilibili.com 的请求，在 Request Headers 中找到 Cookie，提取 SESSDATA=xxx 部分的值。 |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_video_commentsA | 获取 B 站视频的评论内容，支持分页、排序和楼中楼回复。注意：需要有效的 B 站 Cookie 才能正常工作。 |
| get_dynamic_commentsA | 获取 B 站动态的评论内容，支持分页和楼中楼回复。注意：需要有效的 B 站 Cookie 才能正常工作。 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one targets dynamic comments and the other targets video comments, with no overlap in functionality. The descriptions reinforce this by specifying different contexts (dynamic vs. video) while sharing similar features like pagination and nested replies.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_dynamic_comments and get_video_comments), using the same verb 'get' and similar noun structures. This makes the naming predictable and easy to understand across the tool set.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a comments-focused domain, lacking operations like creating, updating, deleting, or searching comments. This minimal set may limit agent workflows, as it only supports retrieval without full CRUD coverage.
The tool set is severely incomplete for a comments domain, missing essential operations such as posting comments, replying to comments, or deleting comments. While retrieval is covered for dynamics and videos, there are significant gaps that will hinder agents from performing common comment-related tasks.