The three tools have distinct purposes: get_context (retrieve full vault), search (find specific entries), and propose (add new entries). While get_context and search both read data, their purposes are clearly separated (bulk fetch vs. targeted lookup), and propos e is clearly a write operation. No meaningful ambiguity between them.

All tool names follow a consistent mymemory_<verb> pattern: get_context, search, propose. The verbs are uniform and descriptive, and each name clearly signals its operation (retrieval, lookup, and write). The mymemory_ prefix consistently scopes the namespace.

Three tools is on the thin side but understandable for a personal memory vault: fetch, search, and write. The scope is narrow enough that three tools could work, though one might expect an explicit update/delete mechanism. It's at the lower boundary of reasonable.

The vault supports retrieval (get_context), search, and creation (propose, gated by PENDING approval). However, there's no tool to update or delete existing active entries, nor to approve the pending queue, meaning maintenance of the vault is delegated entirely to the human in the app. This leaves some lifecycle gaps beyond the core read/write flow.