Skip to main content
Glama
2000sister

task-manager-mcp

by 2000sister
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to task-manager-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • DataBook

      Ethan2298
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage and query SQLite databases through MCP tools, supporting CRUD operations, schema management, and saved views.
      4 npm
      MIT

    • taskboard-mcp

      fellam
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic, SQLite-backed task and todo tracking across multiple project scopes via MCP tools, allowing agents to add, update, list, complete, and delete tasks without hand-editing text files.
      1 npm
      MIT

    • FronyBoard

      Cafelatte1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage projects, roadmaps, periods, and tasks through MCP tools, backed by a local SQLite database with schema validation.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are clearly separated by resource (task, project, category, tag). The only potential confusion is task_update and task_change_status, since status could be considered a task field, and category_list versus project_list when retrieving projects with category context. Descriptions help disambiguate, but there is minor overlap.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent entity_action pattern (category_create, project_delete, tag_list). However, task_add deviates from the create convention used elsewhere, and task_change_status is a multi-word verb unlike the simple single-action names.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools for a task manager with tasks, projects, categories, and tags is well-scoped. Each tool covers a distinct need and none feel redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness3/5

    Tasks have full lifecycle coverage (create/read/update/delete/status), but categories, projects, and tags lack update operations entirely. There is no way to rename a project or recolor a tag without delete/recreate, which is a notable gap in the resource management surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources