pine_session_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It indicates a read-like operation (listing) but does not disclose behavioral traits such as auth requirements, rate limits, or safety guarantees. The description adds minimal insight beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, with a clear one-line summary followed by a structured parameter list. Every sentence adds value and the format is front-loaded, making it easy for an AI to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (not shown but exists), the description adequately covers input parameters and basic behavior. It explains filtering and pagination, which is sufficient for a listing tool. However, it could mention that results are returned as a list.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates by explaining each parameter's purpose and giving examples (e.g., state filter values). It adds meaning beyond the schema, though a full list of possible state values would improve completeness.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists Pine AI sessions with an optional state filter. The verb 'List' is specific and the resource is well-identified, but it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like pine_session_get (single session retrieval), which would improve clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for listing sessions with optional filtering, but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use it or mention alternatives such as pine_session_get for individual sessions. Only inferred usage context is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.