unphurl-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to unphurl-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI agents with zero-cost, zero-dependency trust evaluation for domains, URLs, wallets, APIs, and IPs, returning a 0-100 score with SSL, DNS, WHOIS, security header, and content sub-scores, plus batch comparison to rank multiple targets.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to investigate public URLs through evidence-first intelligence, including crawling, entity resolution, social discovery, SEO, technology detection, monitoring, reports, and optional AI reasoning.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancesecurity tools for AI agents: URL safety scanning, prompt injection detection (200+ patterns), email/password breach checks via HIBP, domain & IP reputation analysis, and AI skill supply chain scanning. Free tier (3 calls/day) or pay-per-request with USDC micropayments via x402.926 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read clean Markdown from any URL and assess source quality with AI-readability scores.6101 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDomain security reconnaissance for AI agents — 13 tools (DNS+DNSSEC, SSL/TLS, HTTP security headers, SPF/DKIM/DMARC email auth, port scan, ASN, RDAP/WHOIS) plus a one-shot security_scan returning a 0–100 Health Score (A–F). Free, no API key.20271 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSecurity intelligence API for AI models. CVE lookup with EPSS/KEV, domain recon (DNS, WHOIS, SSL, subdomains, WAF), and code security checks (secrets, injection, headers). 16 tools, no API key required.5533MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Tools are mostly distinct: check_url vs check_urls are clearly singular/batch, and profile management tools (list_profiles, create_profile, delete_profile, show_defaults) have clear boundaries. However, check_url/check_urls share descriptions almost verbatim verdicts (intentional but could confuse agents), and allowlist tools vs profile tools address different concepts though both modify scoring.
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun (or imperative short) pattern: check_url, list_profiles, create_profile, get_balance, add_to_allowlist. Minor deviations: 'show_defaults' (rather than list_defaults) and 'signup' (rather than sign_up or create_account) are outliers, but overall the pattern is predictable.
With 16 tools, the count is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but still reasonable given the breadth of functionality (auth, URL checking, billing, profiles, allowlists, history). Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and none feels redundant enough to trim, so it's borderline but acceptable.
The server covers the core lifecycle: signup/verification, URL checking (single/batch), billing (purchase, balance, pricing), profile management (CRUD plus defaults), allowlist management (CRUD), and history/stats. Missing operations include password reset or account deletion, but those are minor and not core to the URL-checking domain. The gaps are workaround-able (e.g., no explicit profile export, but not essential).