pcb_delete_selected
Delete currently selected objects in a PCB design. Use this command to remove unwanted components or traces quickly.
Instructions
删除当前选中的对象
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Delete currently selected objects in a PCB design. Use this command to remove unwanted components or traces quickly.
删除当前选中的对象
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only says 'delete' but does not disclose whether deletion is permanent, requires confirmation, or affects other objects. Critical behavioral details are missing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. The action is front-loaded and immediately clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description for a deletion tool with no annotations or output schema. Lacks behavior details like confirmation, undo support, or selection requirements. More context would help, especially given many sibling tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100% trivially. The description adds no parameter info, but there are none to document. Baseline 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it deletes the currently selected object, using a specific verb and resource. It is distinct from sibling tools that delete specific types (e.g., pcb_delete_tracks).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this generic delete vs. specific sibling tools like pcb_delete_tracks or pcb_delete_via. The context of selection is implied but not explained.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/0xruth1ezz/jlc-eda-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server