Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to har-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to analyze browser HAR exports, break down request timing, identify dominant phases and critical request chains, render ASCII waterfalls, and safely redact secrets before analysis.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to locally parse and analyze HAR files through read-only MCP tools, including searching requests, discovering endpoints, tracing values, detecting auth and API patterns, comparing requests, and exporting redacted cURL commands.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Audits HAR captures locally with MCP tools for triage, findings, vendor blast radius, CSP generation, and sanitization—no network calls, redacted by default.
      119 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in the HAR workflow: overview, slowest requests, failed requests, discovery, single-request detail, timeline visualization, and sanitization. Although find_requests overlaps conceptually with slowest_requests and failed_requests, their outputs and intended use are clearly differentiated.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case and are readable, but they mix noun-phrase names (har_overview, slowest_requests, failed_requests, request_detail, waterfall) with verb-phrase names (find_requests, redact_har). The convention is not a single predictable pattern, though it remains understandable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for HAR analysis, covering discovery, drill-down, visualization, and sanitization without redundant endpoints. Each tool earns its place and supports a clear step in the analysis workflow.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full practical lifecycle for examining and sharing a HAR: high-level summary, bottleneck and failure inspection, request lookup and detail, page-load visualization, and safe redaction. No obvious operational gap remains for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues