Skip to main content
Glama
0xNagato
by 0xNagato

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
lint_skillsA

Lint agent SKILL.md files in one or more directories. Reports missing or untriggerable descriptions, name/directory mismatches, oversized bodies, broken file references, duplicate skill names, and pairs of skills too similar for a model to choose between. Use when auditing a skill library, before publishing a skill, or when a skill exists but never seems to get invoked.

lint_mcp_toolsA

Lint an MCP tool schema — pass the JSON from a tools/list response or a bare array of tool objects. Reports missing descriptions, destructive tools with no confirmation gate, unconstrained free-form parameters that widen prompt-injection surface, duplicate tool names, and the per-request token cost of the whole tool list. Use when designing or reviewing an MCP server.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools are cleanly separated by input target: lint_skills operates on SKILL.md files/directories, while lint_mcp_tools operates on MCP tool schema JSON. There is no realistic way to confuse the two, since each description names a distinct artifact and use case.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both names follow an identical verb_noun pattern (lint_skills, lint_mcp_tools) with consistent snake_case and a shared 'lint_' prefix that signals the server's purpose. Fully predictable.

Tool Count4/5

Two tools map directly to the server's two linting domains, so each earns its place and the surface is tightly scoped. It is slightly thin—there is no config, list, or fix operation—but not unreasonably so for a focused linter.

Completeness4/5

The linter covers both advertised domains and reports a broad range of issues (descriptions, naming, size, duplicates, similarity, token cost). Missing auto-fix or rule-configuration operations are minor gaps an agent can work around.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues