Skip to main content
Glama
0xMihirK
by 0xMihirK

Related Servers

Alternatives to Hercules MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to execute Kali Linux security tools like nmap, sqlmap, and hydra in a secure, sandboxed environment. Provides both MCP and HTTP API interfaces for penetration testing and security assessment tasks.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a containerized Kali Linux environment that gives AI assistants access to a comprehensive suite of security and penetration testing tools. It enables automated vulnerability scanning, network reconnaissance, and secure command execution through the Model Context Protocol.
      24
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server that exposes Kali Linux penetration testing tools to AI agents, enabling automated reconnaissance, web application testing, vulnerability assessment, and more.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform penetration testing and security assessments by exposing 60+ Kali Linux security tools including network scanning, web security testing, password cracking, exploitation frameworks, and OSINT capabilities through an AI-friendly interface.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes a hardened Docker container with Kali Linux security tools (nmap, sqlmap, dig, whois, etc.) as MCP tools, enabling network reconnaissance, web analysis, and vulnerability scanning through natural language commands.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 45 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinguishable by their domain prefixes (system_, nmap_, metasploit_, browser_) and specific action verbs. The only potential confusion is between web_scan and web_vuln_scan, but the descriptions clarify that one is for fingerprinting and the other for vulnerability scanning, so an agent can reliably separate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case convention with a <domain>_<action> pattern, such as nmap_scan, metasploit_search, shell_kill_job, and browser_open. There are no mixed naming styles or deviations, making the naming highly predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 45 tools, this server is well above the typical 3-15 tool range and qualifies as 'too many' per the calibration. While each tool has a distinct purpose, the large number (especially 10 browser_* tools and 4 shell_* job tools) creates a heavy surface that could overwhelm agents and increases selection complexity.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core penetration testing lifecycle comprehensively: recon, scanning, exploitation, post-exploitation, web app testing, and browser automation. Minor gaps exist, such as no workspace_list_files or workspace_delete_file, and no dedicated packet capture tool, but shell_exec provides a viable workaround for these missing operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues