WebSex
Related Servers
Alternatives to WebSex
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides access to 13+ penetration testing and security audit tools through a unified MCP interface. Enables security professionals to perform vulnerability scanning, web fuzzing, network reconnaissance, and other security assessments through containerized tools like Nuclei, Nmap, SQLMap, and FFUF.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables professional penetration testers to run reconnaissance, exploitation, brute-force, and credential-cracking tooling (nmap, gobuster, nikto, John the Ripper, hashcat, subfinder, httpx, ffuf, nuclei, hydra, sqlmap, tcpdump) through MCP clients over stdio or HTTP. It also captures engagement records and generates client reports with scope-of-work handling and bearer/OIDC authentication.81 npmGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables professional penetration testers to run reconnaissance, scanning, brute-force, exploitation, traffic capture, and reporting workflows through a unified MCP interface with STDIO, Streamable HTTP, and deprecated SSE transports plus bearer/OIDC authentication. Supports tools including nmap, gobuster, nikto, JtR, hashcat, subfinder, httpx, ffuf, nuclei, hydra, sqlmap, and wordlist generation.81 npmGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables professional penetration testers to run authorized reconnaissance, scanning, exploitation, and reporting workflows through MCP tools such as nmap, ffuf, nuclei, hashcat, and report generation, with STDIO/HTTP/SSE transport and bearer/OIDC auth support.81 npmGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI agents to run autonomous penetration testing and cybersecurity assessments with 150+ security tools, intelligent decision-making, and real-time reporting.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA Kali Linux-based MCP server that exposes over 45 penetration testing tools for AI-assisted security auditing and vulnerability scanning. It features strict scope enforcement, structured output parsing, and persistent finding storage to automate the offensive security workflow.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 179 tools
Despite each tool wrapping a distinct external executable, there is heavy functional overlap: gobuster/ffuf/feroxbuster/dirb/dirsearch all perform directory/content brute-forcing, and multiple scanners (nuclei, nikto, wfuzz, dalfox, xsser) address the same web-audit space. The native probe tools are better differentiated, but an agent must know external tooling nuances to pick correctly.
Every tool uses the websex_ prefix with snake_case, yielding a highly predictable scheme (websex_nmap, websex_browser_navigate, websex_engagement_create). The mix of bare tool names and verb_noun compounds is still internally consistent and readable.
179 tools is far beyond any reasonable per-server surface and well past the 50-tool extreme threshold, creating a large selection burden even though each maps to a real tool. The catalog/execute compact fallback mitigates but does not resolve the overload.
Coverage is remarkably broad across recon, enumeration, web, network, wireless, credentials, exploitation, forensics, binary, and cloud, plus engagement lifecycle and native evidence-first probes. Minor gaps remain, such as no unified reporting/export beyond finding_report, but core offensive workflows are well covered.