Skip to main content
Glama
0x1Jar

llm-toolkit

by 0x1Jar

Related Servers

Alternatives to llm-toolkit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI clients with 26 security and developer tools, enabling tasks like JWT decoding, HTTP header analysis, and phishing URL inspection.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A comprehensive security testing MCP server providing 51 tools for penetration testing, network forensics, memory analysis, and vulnerability assessment. It enables automated security audits and technical investigations across web applications, cloud environments, and network captures.
      51
      49 npm
      23
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server framework featuring dynamic tool loading and a modular one-tool-per-file architecture for rapid development. It supports both Stdio and HTTP transport modes, offering automated test generation and centralized configuration management.
      11
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for identifying SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications using various techniques like error-based, time-based, and union-based scanning. It supports bulk URL processing, WAF bypass strategies, and authenticated testing across multiple database systems.
      13
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for automated bug bounty hunting and security reconnaissance, featuring over 28 specialized tools for subdomain discovery, vulnerability scanning, and traffic analysis. It integrates automated scope validation and professional reporting across multiple platforms like HackerOne and Bugcrowd to streamline security testing.
      5
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose without overlap. analyze-payload and generate-payload are clearly different (analysis vs generation), and all other tools target unique actions or resources.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb-noun hyphenated pattern (analyze-payload, bypass-waf, etc.). The only outlier is 'health' which is a simple noun, but it's minor and the pattern is otherwise consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is on the high side but still reasonable for a toolkit covering security analysis, encoding, MCP management, and reference fetching. Each tool serves a specific function, so the count is appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core functionalities for the stated domain: payload analysis, encoding, WAF bypass, MCP server management, and reference validation. Minor gaps like missing payload editing are acceptable for a toolkit.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing