Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FOFA MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search internet-connected devices, perform IP and host reconnaissance with port, banner and TLS data, run DNS lookups, and retrieve CVE/CPE vulnerability intelligence including CVSS, EPSS and KEV status. It supports credit-aware queries with both stdio and HTTP streaming transports for clients like Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI and Claude Desktop.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform internet-facing reconnaissance and vulnerability research by looking up open ports, banners and TLS details for IPs, searching devices with Shodan query syntax, resolving DNS records in batch, and retrieving CVE/CPE intelligence with CVSS, EPSS and KEV status. Tools are read-only, credit-aware, and exposed over stdio or HTTP streaming.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Aggregates multiple cyberspace search engines (FOFA, Quake, Hunter, ZoomEye) into a unified MCP server, enabling asset search, pagination, statistics, and account info retrieval.
      26
      23 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run reconnaissance tasks such as DNS, WHOIS, certificate transparency, TLS certificate, HTTP header, and limited port checks against explicitly authorized domains and IPs. Scope permissions, deny rules, default-deny resolution pinning, rate budgets, and append-only audit logging are all enforced inside the server so an out-of-scope request cannot be expressed.
      12
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to look up domains, URLs, IPs/ASNs, email addresses, phone numbers, crypto wallets, and business records; run autonomous investigations; collect crawl artifacts; and perform evidence-backed scam checks with traceable provenance.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference when to use alternatives (search vs structured vs next, host vs stats). The search-family trio is well differentiated by intent and the cursor/token flow.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the fofa_ prefix with consistent snake_case and predictable action suffixes (search, search_structured, search_next, host, stats, account_info, health). The pattern is uniform and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a read-only FOFA search API, with each tool earning its place (query building, pagination, host detail, aggregation, account, health). No redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers the full lifecycle of a search service: query construction, pagination continuation, asset drill-down, stats, quota, and config health. Only minor gaps exist, such as bulk export/download, which agents can work around.