Kanban MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Kanban MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage Kanban tasks, boards, teams, and checklists via natural language, with full CRUD operations and live updates.127 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage a local-first Kanban board with Azure DevOps-style workflow rules, including task creation, status updates, subtask breakdown, full-text search, daily summaries, and next-task suggestions.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to manage a personal Kanban board with tasks, subtasks, notes, and code clips using natural language via the Model Context Protocol.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural-language task management with monday.com-style boards, Kanban, subitems, Git-linked commits, and code TODO import, letting Claude create, update, track, and complete tasks.57 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage tasks in a kanban board organized as markdown files, with operations to create, update, delete, move tasks, manage lanes, and get statistics.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered task management with Google Gemini integration, providing CRUD operations, task analytics, CSV export, and natural language interaction for comprehensive project management.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: add-tag modifies metadata, create-task creates new items, move-task changes workflow status, and set-prioity adjusts priority levels. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
The naming is mixed: add-tag and move-task use verb-noun patterns, while create-task and set-prioity use verb-noun but with inconsistent spelling (e.g., 'prioity' vs. 'priority'). This reduces predictability, though the tools remain readable.
With 4 tools, the count is appropriate for a kanban server, covering core operations like task creation, status movement, tagging, and priority setting. It is slightly lean but reasonable for the domain, lacking only minor features like task deletion or listing.
The toolset covers basic CRUD-like operations but has notable gaps: there is no tool to delete tasks, list tasks, or retrieve task details. This could lead to agent failures when full lifecycle management is needed, though core workflows are supported.