The tools are clearly distinguished by their purpose: one captures a public URL, the other handles form-based authentication before capturing. Though both ultimately produce screenshots, the workflow differs enough to avoid confusion.

Both tool names start with 'capture_' and follow a verb-led pattern. The second name uses a prepositional phrase ('with_login') but it remains readable and consistent in style.

With only two tools, the server feels minimal. This is borderline for a narrow purpose but is not egregiously thin; the two covered scenarios (public and authenticated) justify the count.

The domain is screenshot capture, and the two tools cover basic capture and authenticated capture. However, there are minor gaps such as no support for element screenshots, cookie injection, or alternative rendering options, which agents might need but can work around.